Davis v. Johnson

Filing 26

ORDER approving and adopting 20 Report and Recommendations and GRANTING 3 Motion to Dismiss. All remaining motions are DENIED. The Plaintiff has 14 days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint setting forth specific facts that would give the Court jurisdiction under the Little Tucker Act. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 6/15/16. (jkl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION JAMES C. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:15-CV-4137-TWT JEH JOHNSON Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Defendant. ORDER This is an FLSA action seeking overtime pay and law enforcement officer retirement benefits. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 20] recommending that the Government’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 3] be granted. For the reason set forth in the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation, the pro se Plaintiff may not pursue this action as an FLSA collective action or as a class action. The Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction under the Federal Tort Claims Act for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Any claim for retirement benefits must be filed in the Federal Circuit. The Title VII claim should be dismissed for failure to state a claim. T:\ORDERS\15\Davis\15cv4137\r&r.wpd The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. The Government’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 3] is GRANTED. The Plaintiff has 14 days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint setting forth specific facts that would give the Court jurisdiction under the Little Tucker Act. All remaining motions are DENIED. SO ORDERED, this 15 day of June, 2016. /s/Thomas W. Thrash THOMAS W. THRASH, JR. United States District Judge T:\ORDERS\15\Davis\15cv4137\r&r.wpd -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?