Andrade v. Educational Credit Management Corp.
OPINION AND ORDER dismissing this appeal and granting for the limited purpose of dismissing this Appeal Phyllis J. Andrades Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 2 . Signed by Judge William S. Duffey, Jr on 10/11/16. (ddm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
IN RE: PHYLLIS J. ANDRADE
PHYLLIS J. ANDRADE,
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Phyllis J. Andrade’s (“Debtor”) Notice of
Appeal  from the August 17, 2016, Order of the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Georgia, and on Debtor’s Application for Leave to
Proceed In Forma Pauperis  (“IFP Application”).
On August 18, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court denied Debtor’s complaint, as
amended, to discharge her government-guaranteed student loans.1 On
September 15, 2016, Debtor filed her Notice of Appeal and her IFP Application.
Although the Bankruptcy Court’s Order is dated August 17, 2016, it was
entered the next day.
A court must dismiss an action filed in forma pauperis if at any time the
court determines that the action or appeal is frivolous or malicious or that it fails to
state a claim on which relief can be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii). An
issue is frivolous when it appears that the legal theories are “indisputably
meritless.” See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989); Carroll v. Gross,
984 F.2d 392, 393 (11th Cir. 1993). An in forma pauperis action is frivolous if it
is “without arguable merit either in law or fact.” Napier v. Preslicka, 314 F.3d
528, 531 (11th Cir. 2002); Bilal v. Driver, 251 F.3d 1346, 1349 (11th Cir. 2001).
“Arguable means capable of being convincingly argued.” Sun v. Forrester,
939 F.2d 924, 925 (11th Cir. 1991). Where a claim is arguable, but ultimately will
be unsuccessful, it should be allowed to proceed. See Cofield v. Ala. Pub. Serv.
Comm’n, 936 F.2d 512, 515 (11th Cir. 1991).
The final judgments and orders of the bankruptcy court may be appealed to
the district court. 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1). When an appeal “has not been
prosecuted in the manner directed, within the time limited by the acts of Congress,
it must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205,
210 (2007) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting United States v. Curry,
47 U.S. 106, 113 (1848)). The filing of an appeal within the prescribed time is
“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Id. at 209 (quoting Griggs v. Provident Consumer
Disc. Co., 459 U.S. 56, 61 (1982) (per curiam)); see Williams v. EMC Mortg.
Corp., 216 F.3d 1295, 1298 (11th Cir. 2000) (“If the notice [of appeal] is not
timely filed, the appellate court is without jurisdiction to hear the appeal.”). To be
timely, a “notice of appeal shall be filed with the clerk within 14 days of the date
of the entry of the judgment, order, or decree appealed from.” Fed. R. Bankr. P.
8002(a); see 28 U.S.C. § 158(c)(2).2
Here, the fourteen-day period within which to appeal the Bankruptcy Court’s
August 18, 2016, Order expired after September 1, 2016. See Fed. R. Bankr.
P. 8002(a); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(a) (when a period is stated in days, count every
date, including intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays); Fed. R.
Bankr. P. 9022 (“Lack of notice of the entry [of a judgment or order of a
bankruptcy judge] does not affect the time to appeal or relieve or authorize the
court to relieve a party for failure to appeal within the time allowed, except as
permitted in Rule 8002.”); In re B.J. McAdams, Inc., 999 F.2d 1221, 1225 (8th Cir.
1993) (“[T]he time to file the motions or notice of appeal runs from the entry of
judgment, not from service of notice of the judgment.”); In re Reynolds, 215 B.R.
The Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure apply to bankruptcy
proceedings in district court. See Rosenberg v. DVI Receivables XIV, LLC, 818
F.3d. 1283, 1287-88 (11th Cir. 2016); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001(a) (“These Part VIII
rules govern the procedure in a United States district court and a bankruptcy
appellate panel on appeal from a judgment, order, or decree of a bankruptcy
89, 91 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1997) (it is well-established that Rule 9006(f) does not
add three days to the period to file a notice of appeal under Rule 8002(a), despite
the fact that notice of the judgment was mailed) (citing In re Schimmels, 85 F.3d
416, 419-20 & n.4 (9th Cir. 1996)). Because Debtor filed her Notice of Appeal on
September 15, 2016, almost a month after entry of the order from which she seeks
to appeal, the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. See Bowles, 551
U.S. at 210 (“[W]hen an ‘appeal has not been prosecuted in the manner directed,
within the time limited by the acts of Congress, it must be dismissed for want of
jurisdiction.’”); Williams, 216 F.3d 1295, 1298. Debtor’s untimely appeal from
the Bankruptcy Court’s August 18, 2016, Order is required to be dismissed.
For the foregoing reasons,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Appeal is DISMISSED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Phyllis J. Andrade’s Application for
Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis  is GRANTED for the limited purpose of
dismissing this Appeal.
SO ORDERED this 11th day of October, 2016.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?