Jones v. DAL Global Services, LLC et al

Filing 44

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 41 Report and Recommendations, DENYING 25 Motion to Dismiss and GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 32 Motion to Amend. The Plaintiff is ordered to file a Second Amended Complaint removing her proposed claims of assault and battery within 7 days of this order, which will serve as the controlling complaint in this action. The Defendants Nippon and Grane are ordered to respond within 14 days of the docketing of the Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 2/26/18. (jkl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION FRIEDA T. JONES, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:17-CV-1589-TWT DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, et al., Defendants. ORDER This is an employment discrimination action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 41] of the Magistrate Judge recommending that the Defendant Grane’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 25] should be denied and that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend [Doc. 32] should be granted in part and denied in part. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. The Defendant Grane’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 25] is DENIED. The Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend [Doc. 32] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Plaintiff is ordered to file a Second Amended Complaint removing her proposed claims of assault and battery within 7 days of this order, which will serve as the T:\ORDERS\17\Jones\17cv1589\r&r.wpd controlling complaint in this action. The Defendants Nippon and Grane are ordered to respond within 14 days of the docketing of the Second Amended Complaint. SO ORDERED, this 26 day of February, 2018. /s/Thomas W. Thrash THOMAS W. THRASH, JR. United States District Judge T:\ORDERS\17\Jones\17cv1589\r&r.wpd -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?