Jones v. DAL Global Services, LLC et al
Filing
44
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 41 Report and Recommendations, DENYING 25 Motion to Dismiss and GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 32 Motion to Amend. The Plaintiff is ordered to file a Second Amended Complaint removing her proposed claims of assault and battery within 7 days of this order, which will serve as the controlling complaint in this action. The Defendants Nippon and Grane are ordered to respond within 14 days of the docketing of the Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 2/26/18. (jkl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
FRIEDA T. JONES,
Plaintiff,
v.
CIVIL ACTION FILE
NO. 1:17-CV-1589-TWT
DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, et
al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
This is an employment discrimination action. It is before the Court on the
Report and Recommendation [Doc. 41] of the Magistrate Judge recommending that
the Defendant Grane’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 25] should be denied and that the
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend [Doc. 32] should be granted in part and denied
in part. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court
approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court.
The Defendant Grane’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 25] is DENIED. The Plaintiff’s
Motion for Leave to Amend [Doc. 32] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The
Plaintiff is ordered to file a Second Amended Complaint removing her proposed
claims of assault and battery within 7 days of this order, which will serve as the
T:\ORDERS\17\Jones\17cv1589\r&r.wpd
controlling complaint in this action. The Defendants Nippon and Grane are ordered
to respond within 14 days of the docketing of the Second Amended Complaint.
SO ORDERED, this 26 day of February, 2018.
/s/Thomas W. Thrash
THOMAS W. THRASH, JR.
United States District Judge
T:\ORDERS\17\Jones\17cv1589\r&r.wpd
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?