Annamalai v. Harman

Filing 39

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 10 / 17 Final Report and Recommendation and DENYING Petitioner's Motions ( 19 , 24 , 26 , 27 , 31 , 35 ). The appeal is frivolous. The Clerk is directed to file any papers received from the Petitioner. However, no papers are to be docketed as motions requiring action by the Court unless the Clerk receives my express consent. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 1/22/2018. (jkl)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI,
Petitioner,
v.

CIVIL ACTION FILE
NO. 1:17-CV-4837-TWT

DARRIN HARMAN
WARDEN,
Respondent.
ORDER

This is a pro se habeas corpus action. It is before the Court on the Petitioner’s
Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections [Doc. 19]. The Petitioner has filed
his Objections to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Petitioner’s Motion
for Extension of Time to File Objections [Doc. 19] is DENIED as moot. The
Objections are totally without merit. The Magistrate Judge was not required to
consider the First Amended Petition which was filed after she issued her Report and
Recommendation. The Petitioner’s Verified Second Brief is a lot of nonsense. Given
the Petitioner’s long history of frivolous litigation, the Magistrate Judge was not
required to waste her time and my time by responding to every absurd and ridiculous
argument made by the Petitioner. She did, however, address them in her Supplement
T:\ORDERS\17\Annamalai\17cv4837\r&r.wpd

to Final Report and Recommendation [Doc. 17]. The Court approves and adopts the
Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. This action is
DISMISSED. The Petitioner’s Motion to Not Transfer [Doc. 24] is DENIED. The
Petitioner’s Motion to Not Transfer [Doc. 26] is DENIED. The Petitioner’s Motion
for Specific Relief [Doc. 27] is DENIED. The Emergency Motion for Petitioner’s
Release [Doc. 31] is DENIED. The Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [Doc. 35]
is DENIED. The appeal is frivolous. The Clerk is directed to file any papers received
from the Petitioner. However, no papers are to be docketed as motions requiring
action by the Court unless the Clerk receives my express consent.
SO ORDERED, this 22 day of January, 2018.

/s/Thomas W. Thrash
THOMAS W. THRASH, JR.
United States District Judge

T:\ORDERS\17\Annamalai\17cv4837\r&r.wpd

-2-