Atlanta Home Connections v. Butts
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 3 Final Report and Recommendation. This case is hereby REMANDED to the Magistrate Court of Rockdale County. There being no further issues before the Court, the Clerk is DIRECTED to close the case. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 4/12/2018. (sap)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA HOME CONNECTIONS,
PAMELA BUTTS, and All Others,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Final Report and
Recommendation that this dispossessory action be remanded to the Magistrate
Court of Rockdale County [Doc. 3]. No objections have been filed in response to
the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation. Therefore, in accordance with 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court
has reviewed the Magistrate’s Recommendation for clear error and finds none.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation as the opinion of this Court. For the reasons stated in the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court REMANDS this
case to the Magistrate Court of Rockdale County.1 There being no further issues
before the Court, the Clerk is DIRECTED to close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of April, 2018.
United States District Judge
As this case involves a pro se party, the Court provides further guidance. An order remanding
the case means that the case will continue to be heard, but in the court where it was originally
filed – here, the Magistrate Court of Rockdale County. The case is simply being returned to the
Magistrate Court of Rockdale County for further proceedings. Because the case is not being
dismissed, there is no right to appeal this order. Any future motions should be filed with the
Magistrate Court of Rockdale County.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?