Jones v. Carr et al
Filing
6
ORDER and OPINION OVERRULING the Petitioner's 5 Objections and ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 3 Final Report and Recommendation. This action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the USDC for the Middle District of Georgia, Valdosta Division, for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Orinda D. Evans on 5/21/2018. (sap)
MAY 2 f 2018
I N THE U N I T E D STATES DISTRICT CO
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORCrA
A T L A N T A DIVISION
CRAIG L . JONES,
Petitioner,
PRISONER HABEAS CORPUS
28 U.S.C. § 2254
V.
CHRISTOPHER CARR et al.,
Respondents.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
l:18-CV-1724-ODE
ORDER
Petitioner is a state prisoner who, pro se, filed a "NOTICE & D E M A N D FOR
ORDERTO V A C A T E V O I D JUDGMENT." (Doc. I at I . ) The judgment Petitioner
seeks to vacate is his judgment of conviction entered in the Superior Court of Thomas
County, Georgia. (Id.)
Thomas County is within the jurisdiction o f the U.S. District Court for the
Middle District o f Georgia. Before filing this action, Petitioner filed similar actions
in that court claiming that his judgment o f conviction is void. See Pet., Jones v.
McLaughlin,
No. 7:17-cv-149-HL-TQL ( M . D . Ga. Sept. 5, 2017); Pet., Jones v.
Georgia, No. 7:17-cv-l 16-HL-TQL (M.D. Ga. June 26, 2017).
Apparently because he has not obtained relief in the Middle District, Petitioner
filed this action in this Court against two State officials located here. (See Doc. I.)
Petitioner does not expressly seek relief under the federal habeas corpus laws, but
AO 72A
(Rev. 8/82)
instead relies on Federal Rule o f Civil Procedure 60 and other laws regarding void
judgments. {Id.)
Magistrate Judge Walker found that Petitioner cannot obtain relief in federal
court from his judgment o f conviction except under the federal habeas corpus laws.
(Doc. 3.) Judge Walker (and the Clerk) thus construed Petitioner's filing as a petition
for a writ o f habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, which provides relief from a
judgment o f conviction entered in state court in violation o f the petitioner's rights
under federal law. {Id.) But because Petitioner's judgment of conviction was entered
within the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District o f Georgia,
Judge Walker issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") that the petition be
transferred to that court. {Id.) Petitioner filed objections to the R&R. (Doc. 5.)
A district judge must conduct a careful and complete review o f a magistrate
judge's R & R .
Williams v. Wainwright,
681 F.2d 732, 732 (11th Cir. 1982). The
district judge must "make a de novo determination of those portions of the [R&R] to
which objection is made," 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), while those portions ofthe R & R for
which there is no objection are reviewed only for clear error, Macort v. Prem,
208 F. A p p ' x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006); see Fed. R Civ. P. 72(b).
AO 72A
(Rev.8/82)
Inc.,
Petitioner objects to construing his filing as a habeas petition, arguing that it "is
NOT to be perceived as a writ o f habeas corpus." (Doc. 5 at 2.) He insists that the
filing "is what I have said it is, a demand to vacate a void judgment, and w i l l be
treated under the Rule for Relief from Judgment, as in 'the judgment is void.'" {Id.)
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60 provides relief only from judgments
rendered by federal courts, not judgments rendered by state courts. Petitioner is
challenging, as void, a judgment rendered by a state court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60.
The R & R correctly concluded that Petitioner can obtain the relief he seeks in federal
courtonlyunder28U.S.C. §2254. SeeMcCormickv.
CityofFlorala,^o.
16-17491-
A, 2017 W L 6521787, at *2-3 ( U t h Cir. Oct. 18, 2017) (holding that district court
properly construed state prisoner's Rule 60 motion to vacate his judgment o f
conviction as void as a § 2254 petition). A n d the § 2254 action must proceed in the
Middle District because Thomas County is located there.
Accordingly, Petitioner's objections to the R & R [5] are O V E R R U L E D . The
Court A D O P T S the R & R [3] as the opinion o f the Court.
This action is
T R A N S F E R R E D to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District o f Georgia,
Valdosta Division, for further proceedings.
AO 72A
(Rev.8/82)
s o O R D E R E D this ^ |
day of May, 2018.
ORINDA D. EVANS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
AO 72A
(Rev.8/82)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?