Guitron v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. et al

Filing 13

MDL ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of Georgia. CASE CLOSED. ELECTRONIC TRANSFER SENT. (Donati, J) [Transferred from California Eastern on 4/28/2021.]

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: PARAGARD IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION

FILED
Apr 27, 2021
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MDL No. 2974

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −16)

On December 16, 2020, the Panel transferred 49 civil action(s) to the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1407. See _F.Supp.3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2020). Since that time, 103 additional action(s) have
been transferred to the Northern District of Georgia. With the consent of that court, all such actions
have been assigned to the Honorable Leigh Martin May.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Georgia and assigned to
Judge May.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
Northern District of Georgia for the reasons stated in the order of December 16, 2020, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Leigh Martin May.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall
be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:
Apr 26, 2021

ATTEST: A TRUE COPY
CERTIFIED THIS

John W. Nichols
Clerk of the Panel

4/26/2021
Date: __________________________
JAMES N. HATTEN, Clerk

s/ T. Frazier
By: ____________________________
Deputy Clerk

IN RE: PARAGARD IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION

MDL No. 2974

SCHEDULE CTO−16 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST

DIV.

C.A.NO.

CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA CENTRAL
CAC

2

21−02780

Caley Joyner v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. et al

CALIFORNIA EASTERN
CAE
CAE

2
2

21−00626
21−00629

Guitron v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. et al
Romero v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. et al

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
CAN

4

21−02246

Barnes v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA et al

1

21−00985

Tlamayo v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al

21−00321

Capps v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al

21−01705

Rosen v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al

21−10605

Fulani v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. et al

COLORADO
CO

FLORIDA MIDDLE
FLM

3

ILLINOIS NORTHERN
ILN

1

MASSACHUSETTS
MA

1

NEW YORK NORTHERN
NYN

5

21−00393

Jonza v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al

21−01315

Lapp v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al

OHIO SOUTHERN
OHS

2

Opposed 4/23/21

TEXAS SOUTHERN
TXS

4

21−01155

Longoria v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al

21−00282

Del Rosario v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al

21−00393

Hill v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al

TEXAS WESTERN
TXW

1

WISCONSIN EASTERN
WIE

2