Romero v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. et al
Filing
13
MDL ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to District of Northern District of Georgia. CASE CLOSED. ELECTRONIC TRANSFER SENT. (Donati, J) [Transferred from California Eastern on 4/28/2021.]
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: PARAGARD IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
FILED
Apr 27, 2021
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MDL No. 2974
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −16)
On December 16, 2020, the Panel transferred 49 civil action(s) to the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1407. See _F.Supp.3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2020). Since that time, 103 additional action(s) have
been transferred to the Northern District of Georgia. With the consent of that court, all such actions
have been assigned to the Honorable Leigh Martin May.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Georgia and assigned to
Judge May.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
Northern District of Georgia for the reasons stated in the order of December 16, 2020, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Leigh Martin May.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall
be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
FOR THE PANEL:
Apr 26, 2021
ATTEST: A TRUE COPY
CERTIFIED THIS
John W. Nichols
Clerk of the Panel
4/26/2021
Date: __________________________
JAMES N. HATTEN, Clerk
s/ T. Frazier
By: ____________________________
Deputy Clerk
IN RE: PARAGARD IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
MDL No. 2974
SCHEDULE CTO−16 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS
DIST
DIV.
C.A.NO.
CASE CAPTION
CALIFORNIA CENTRAL
CAC
2
21−02780
Caley Joyner v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. et al
CALIFORNIA EASTERN
CAE
CAE
2
2
21−00626
21−00629
Guitron v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. et al
Romero v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. et al
CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
CAN
4
21−02246
Barnes v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA et al
1
21−00985
Tlamayo v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
21−00321
Capps v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
21−01705
Rosen v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
21−10605
Fulani v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. et al
COLORADO
CO
FLORIDA MIDDLE
FLM
3
ILLINOIS NORTHERN
ILN
1
MASSACHUSETTS
MA
1
NEW YORK NORTHERN
NYN
5
21−00393
Jonza v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
21−01315
Lapp v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
OHIO SOUTHERN
OHS
2
Opposed 4/23/21
TEXAS SOUTHERN
TXS
4
21−01155
Longoria v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
21−00282
Del Rosario v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
21−00393
Hill v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
TEXAS WESTERN
TXW
1
WISCONSIN EASTERN
WIE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?