Electrolux Home Prod v. Whitesell Corp
Filing
726
ORDER denying as moot 671 Motion for Discovery; denying as moot 696 Motion for Hearing, and vacating the hearing date set for October 21, 2015. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/19/2015. (thb)
IN THE UNITED
STATES
DISTRICT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF
COURT
FOR THE
GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
WHITESELL CORPORATION,
*
Plaintiff,
*
v.
*
ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS,
INC., HUSQVARNA, A.B., and
HUSQVARNA OUTDOOR PRODUCTS,
INC.,
CV
103-050
*
*
*
*
*
Defendants.
*
ORDER
On October 16, 2015, the parties in the captioned matter
submitted their list of discovery issues ripe for the Court's
consideration at the October 21, 2015 monthly hearing.
Order of Aug. 17, 2015, Doc. No. 680.)
list
involved
the
outstanding
(See
The first item on that
motion
filed
by
Whitesell
Corporation ("Whitesell") to compel Defendant Electrolux Home
Products, Inc.
3000
produced
"Confidential."
the parties'
("EHP") to change the designation of more than
documents
from
(See Doc. No.
"Attorneys
671.)
Eyes
Only"
As of October 16,
to
2015,
dispute had been reduced to a single document.
On the morning of October 19, 2015, the parties informed the
Court that they had resolved even that dispute.
Upon
the
"Attorney's
foregoing,
Eyes
Only"
Whitesell's
motion
designation
from
to
remove
EHP's
the
document
production (doc. no. 671) and its motion for a hearing on this
issue
(doc.
no.
696)
are DENIED AS MOOT.
Further, because the parties have represented that there
are no discovery matters ripe for consideration by this Court
at its monthly hearing, the hearing date of October 21, 2015,
is hereby VACATED.1
ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia,
October,
this
/ / day of
2015.
HONORABLE J. 'RANDAL HALIX
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
—SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
1 The only other issue mentioned by the parties in their
list
of issues submitted
discovery matter.
on
October
16,
2015,
is
not
a
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?