Electrolux Home Prod v. Whitesell Corp

Filing 726

ORDER denying as moot 671 Motion for Discovery; denying as moot 696 Motion for Hearing, and vacating the hearing date set for October 21, 2015. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/19/2015. (thb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF COURT FOR THE GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION WHITESELL CORPORATION, * Plaintiff, * v. * ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC., HUSQVARNA, A.B., and HUSQVARNA OUTDOOR PRODUCTS, INC., CV 103-050 * * * * * Defendants. * ORDER On October 16, 2015, the parties in the captioned matter submitted their list of discovery issues ripe for the Court's consideration at the October 21, 2015 monthly hearing. Order of Aug. 17, 2015, Doc. No. 680.) list involved the outstanding (See The first item on that motion filed by Whitesell Corporation ("Whitesell") to compel Defendant Electrolux Home Products, Inc. 3000 produced "Confidential." the parties' ("EHP") to change the designation of more than documents from (See Doc. No. "Attorneys 671.) Eyes Only" As of October 16, to 2015, dispute had been reduced to a single document. On the morning of October 19, 2015, the parties informed the Court that they had resolved even that dispute. Upon the "Attorney's foregoing, Eyes Only" Whitesell's motion designation from to remove EHP's the document production (doc. no. 671) and its motion for a hearing on this issue (doc. no. 696) are DENIED AS MOOT. Further, because the parties have represented that there are no discovery matters ripe for consideration by this Court at its monthly hearing, the hearing date of October 21, 2015, is hereby VACATED.1 ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, October, this / / day of 2015. HONORABLE J. 'RANDAL HALIX UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE —SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 1 The only other issue mentioned by the parties in their list of issues submitted discovery matter. on October 16, 2015, is not a

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?