Brown v. Sheriff of Richmond County et al

Filing 89

ORDER adopting the 87 Report and Recommendation; denying as moot 83 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; denying as moot 83 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; granting 82 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution; dismissing this case with prejudice; closing this civil aciton; and directing that judgment be entered in favor of Defendant. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 03/08/2011. (thb)

Download PDF
Brown v. Sheriff of Richmond County et al Doc. 89 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION WILLIE WESLEY BROWN, Plaintiff, V. ) ) ) ) ) CV 109-144 ELAINE JOHNSON, the Clerk of the Superior Court of Richmond County, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Plaintiff's "Motion for Extension of Time to Conduct Discovery and Motion for Leave to Untimely File [a] Reply to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment" are DENIED AS MOOT (doc. nos. 83-1, 83-2); Defendant's Second Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED (doc. no. 82); Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; this civil action is CLOSED; and a judgment shall be ENTERED in favor of Defendant. SO ORDERED this S" day of March, 2011, at Augusta, Georgia. HONATLE J. RANDAL HALL UNITEID STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?