Finch v. Medical College of Georgia et al

Filing 44

ORDER adopting 38 Report and Recommendations; denying 31 RULE 35 MOTION for Physical Examination; denying 33 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 36 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; finding as moot 43 MOTION Physical Evaluation/Examination; dismissing the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's state law claims; and this case stands closed. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 03/17/2010. (thb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION ROBERT CURTIS FINCH, Plaintiff, V. CV 109-150 MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA, et al., Defendants. ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Plaintiff's "Motion for Summary Judgment" (doe. no. 33) is DENIED, and Plaintiff's "Rule 35 Motion For Physical Evidence" (doe. no. 31) is DENIED. Furthermore, the above-captioned complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice, and this civil action is CLOSED.' SO ORDERED this /7iay of March, 2010, at Augusta, Georgia. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 'Plaintiff's "Motion In A Civil Action," and Plaintiff's "Rule 35 Motion for Physical Evaluation/Examination" (doe. nos. 36, 43), are MOOT.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?