Schmitt v. Craig et al

Filing 100

ORDER adopting the 98 Report and Recommendation, dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Kilpatrick, and dismissing Defendant Kilpatrick from this case. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 11/15/2011. (thb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION MARK HERBERT SCHMITT, Plaintiff, V. ) ) ) ) CV 110-102 ) SUSAN M. REIMER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Kilpatrick are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to timely effect service, and Defendant Kilpatrick is DISMISSED from this case. SO ORDERED this /5'4ay of November, 2011, at Augusta, Georgia. BLE J(RANDAL HALL STATES DISTRICT JUDGE RN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?