Raiford et al v. National Hills Exchange, LLC et al
Filing
267
ORDER directing the parties to brief the issue whether the current owner of the shopping center must be joined as party under Rule 19. Brief due by 10/14/2016. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/07/2016. (thb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
J. WAYNE RAIFORD and B, T & R
*
Enterprises, LLC,
*
*
Plaintiffs,
*
v,
*
NATIONAL HILLS EXCHANGE,
CV
111-152
*
Defendant.
*
*
ORDER
In
Hills
this
case,
Exchange,
Plaintiffs
LLC
breached
Augusta,
shopping
center
in
National
Hills
Exchange
equitable
allege
remedy
for
Defendant
a purchase-sale
(Doc.
insolvent,
Plaintiffs
alleged
National
agreement
Georgia.
is
the
that
breach.
1.)
for
a
Because
seek
an
Specifically,
Plaintiffs request that the Court grant them an interest in the
company that currently owns the shopping center.
orders,
relief.
the Court
(See Doc.
has
questioned
118 at 72;
Doc.
its
ability
239 at 28.)
In previous
to
grant
this
But neither
party has addressed the issue.
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19, a court must join
a party if:
accord
"(A)
complete
in that person's absence,
relief
among
existing
the court cannot
parties;
or
(B)
that
person claims an interest relating to the subject of the action
and is so situated that disposing of the action in the person's
absence
may . . . impede
interest . . . ."
whether
it
joining
the
can
Fed. R.
grant
current
Accordingly,
the
issue by Friday,
the
the
owner
parties
person's
Civ.
P.
relief
of
the
are
October 14,
19(a).
shopping
to
to
protect
the
The Court questions
Plaintiffs
ORDERED
2016:
ability
seek without
center
brief
as
the
a
first
party.
following
Whether the current owner of
the shopping center must be joined as a party under Rule 19.
ORDER
October,
ENTERED
at
Augusta,
Georgia
this
__/_^/^day
of
2016.
H0W9RMKLE J.
RANDAL HALL
UNITED]STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?