Raiford et al v. National Hills Exchange, LLC et al

Filing 267

ORDER directing the parties to brief the issue whether the current owner of the shopping center must be joined as party under Rule 19. Brief due by 10/14/2016. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/07/2016. (thb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION J. WAYNE RAIFORD and B, T & R * Enterprises, LLC, * * Plaintiffs, * v, * NATIONAL HILLS EXCHANGE, CV 111-152 * Defendant. * * ORDER In Hills this case, Exchange, Plaintiffs LLC breached Augusta, shopping center in National Hills Exchange equitable allege remedy for Defendant a purchase-sale (Doc. insolvent, Plaintiffs alleged National agreement Georgia. is the that breach. 1.) for a Because seek an Specifically, Plaintiffs request that the Court grant them an interest in the company that currently owns the shopping center. orders, relief. the Court (See Doc. has questioned 118 at 72; Doc. its ability 239 at 28.) In previous to grant this But neither party has addressed the issue. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19, a court must join a party if: accord "(A) complete in that person's absence, relief among existing the court cannot parties; or (B) that person claims an interest relating to the subject of the action and is so situated that disposing of the action in the person's absence may . . . impede interest . . . ." whether it joining the can Fed. R. grant current Accordingly, the issue by Friday, the the owner parties person's Civ. P. relief of the are October 14, 19(a). shopping to to protect the The Court questions Plaintiffs ORDERED 2016: ability seek without center brief as the a first party. following Whether the current owner of the shopping center must be joined as a party under Rule 19. ORDER October, ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia this __/_^/^day of 2016. H0W9RMKLE J. RANDAL HALL UNITED]STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?