Reddick v. Astrue
Filing
23
ORDER adopting 16 Report and Recommendations; affirming the Acting Commissioner's final decision; closing this civil action; and entering a final judgment in favor of the Acting Commissioner. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 02/25/2014. (thb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
JAMES W. REDDICK,
Plaintiff,
CV 112-152
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security
Administration,
Defendant.
ORDER
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate
Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. (Doc. no.
18.) After thorough consideration of the grounds of alleged error in Plaintiffs briefing,
(doc. no. 7), and the Acting Commissioner's responses, (doc. no. 10), the Magistrate
Judge recommended that the Acting Commissioner's final decision be affirmed because
(1) the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") properly rejected Plaintiffs testimony
concerning the intensity, pain, and limiting effects of his back and knee conditions, (2)
the ALJ properly determined Plaintiffs residual functional capacity ("RFC") after
assessing all of the evidence and testimony in the record, and (3) the ALJ's decision
properly incorporated the testimony of the Vocational Expert ("VE"). (See generally
doc. no. 16.)
The Court hereby OVERRULES Plaintiffs objections because they restate the
claims that the Magistrate Judge has already addressed at length and do not offer any new
information or evidence that warrants a deviation from the Magistrate Judge's
recommendation.
(See generally doc. no. 18.)
Accordingly, the Report and
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
Therefore, the Acting Commissioner's final decision is AFFIRMED, this civil action is
CLOSED, and a final judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Acting Commissioner.
id
SO ORDERED this^Tday ofFebmarj^OT^at Augusta, Georgia.
\
HONORABLE J. RANDAL HAL!
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
.SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?