Jones v. The Georgia Department of Transportation et al

Filing 28

ORDER that, subsequent to the Plaintiff's failure to respond to the Court's 26 Order dated June 5, 2014 and the Plaintiff's failure to respond to the Defendants' 27 Motion to Dismiss and accordingly, this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. The Clerk is directed to terminate all motions and close the case. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 11/13/2014. (jah)

THE T'NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOIITHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION

IN

JONES.

SAKETHIA

olrinr-iff

c v 1 1 3- 0 2 5

v.
THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT O F
TRANSPORTAT]ON, EI A1 .,

De fendant s .

ORDER

before

Presentfy
Dt:rr1-i

corlrf

r.,c

m a ), .
rrrs v ,

prejudice
with

affer

for

an

negl-ect's any
acLion
Civil

of

Procedure

4I

or

defendant
ElEn

Court
t-hi

c

notes

P

that

a^rrrt-

Drosecute

fu v \
.

this

p

or

a

the

action

or

any

Plaintiff
r v y + yt anl-

acti-on,

Federal-

rules

L(J

/h)

Iv Tvnr/ \ y r
y r

has failed
rJE r srr(rd.rr. u r

r
4

rorriaur

.'\f

compfy

prosecute

to

these

21

without

to

plaintiff

the

the

disobeys

with

comply

ar\/

fails

Moreover,
* til f

or

fail-s

dismiss

may move to

it."

that

(1)

Dismiss

41,1,

with

willfully

(3)

or

to

RUle

action

Q\

promptness.

states

prosecute

to

court;

Motion

LOCaI

a party

if

discovery;

the

reasonable

with

rrnder

anv

prosecution

compelling
order

\

dismiss

nofice

want of

order

Defendants'

is
.?

/r1^^

^ v^l m !n t r: rrLr. _
L
ty qr

-

Court

the

to

compl-v with

-'\f

i.\nq

^nd

to

order,

claim

l-ho

the

Rul-e of
fails

court

or

a

against

rarr"'rrl

an order
rli- ha1^\^7i _^

l-hc

of

June

counsel-

]eave

to

pleinfiff

fo

nof.ifv

whether

she

(Id. )

In

failure

(20)

qA^iamhar

1q

october

4l- (b) ,

Rule

(Doc.

requests.
6,

2oI4,

t-his
ur

failure
motions

acuion

to

to

that

pro

rrrF<Fnf

to

Thus,

se-

On

m.)fiOn

al-so

v/as directed

(Id.)
neither

Pl-aintiff

tO

that

claim

Defendants'

do.

counsel '

case.

proceed

any of

to

So,

new

her

they

dlscovery
respond

by

thirty-seven

response.
is

for
DISMISSED WITHOUT PRE,JITDICE

prosecute.

The

and cLOsE the
Augusta,

Georgia,

C]erk

is

directed

to

case.

ORDER ENTERED at
November,

whi-ch

in

whj-ch she has yet

annnrA.innlrr

all

l-he

Pfaintiff

27.\

4erv!urraYfJ,

terminate

to

filed

response

(37) days have passed without

Plaintiff's

a motion

if

Plaintiff

of

and

(20)

and,

with

instructed

dismissaf

directed

twenty

matter

expired,

f il-ed

Court

within

or

se

CourE
in

The

the

pro

nrfendanfs

has made no

Pfaintiff

the

period

day

)n1 l

under

pursue

to

resulL

new counsel- nor

!EyLeLL'!L!

dismiss

Order,

do so coufd

twenty

writing,

proceeding

be

would

in

former

Plaintiff's

26.)

Court,

intended

that

to

retained

the

granted

(Doc.

withdraw.

she

whether

days

This

5,

Coul:t

the

20I4,

On

this

/34

U^"

2014,

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

of