Anthony v. Brown et al

Filing 80

ORDER overruling Plaintiff's objections; granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution; denying as moot 27 Motion for Documents ; denying as moot 29 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 33 Motion t o Appoint Counsel ; denying as moot 34 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying as moot 36 Motion to "request this witness statement and sick call form be placed in case file" ; denying as moot 37 Motion for Leave to File; denying as mo ot 39 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying as moot 50 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying as moot 58 Motion for Discovery; denying as moot 60 "Motion (titled Declaration) for copies of all the doc. I have submitted to the Court's containing to my case" ; denying as moot 63 Motion ; denying as moot 65 Motion for Protective Order; denying as moot 67 Motion for Protective Order; adopting 72 Report and Recommendations.; denying as moot 15 Motion to Dismiss; d enying as moot 18 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. This case is dismissed without prejudice, and this civil action is closed. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 04/03/2014. (thb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION

JERRY WAYNE ANTHONY, JR.,
Plaintiff,
CV 113-058

DENNIS BROWN, Warden, et al.
Defendants.

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate
Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. (Doc. no. 79.)
Plaintiff does not offer any new information, evidence, or argument that warrants a deviation

from

the

Magistrate

Judge's

recommendation.

Thus, Plaintiffs

objections are

OVERRULED. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is
ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

Therefore, Defendants Dennis Brown's, T.J.

Conley's, and Donna Young's (hereinafter "Defendants") motions to dismiss for want of
prosecution are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, (doc. nos. 24, 25),

Defendants' pre-answer motions to dismiss and motions for protective orders are DENIED
AS MOOT, (doc. nos. 15, 18, 65, 67), Plaintiffs motions are DENIED AS MOOT, (doc.

no. 27, 29, 33, 34, 36, 37, 39, 50, 58, 60, 63), this case is DISMISSED without prejudice,
and this civil action is CLOSED.

SO ORDERED thi§^_ day of April, 2014, at Augusta, Georgia.

\L HALL

UNIT£# STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
JTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA