Neal v. Collins et al

Filing 25

ORDER allowing plaintiff additional time to respond to 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Response is due by 5:00pm on October 2, 2014. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 9/18/14. (cmr)

IN THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT

COURT

FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
*

LINDA MICHELLE NEAL,

*
*

Plaintiff,

*
*

v.

*

CV

113-076

*

THOMSON PLASTICS,

INC.,

*
*

Defendant.

*

ORDER

Plaintiff

Motion

for

reluctant

Plaintiff.

has

failed

Summary

to

rule

to

file

Judgment
on

the

a

(Doc.

motion

response

23),

to

and

without

the

first

the Court recognizes
and

Therefore,

motion

still

that

from

Nevertheless,

that Plaintiff is acting pro se in this

Defendant's

summary

motion

is

dispositive

judgment

by

5:00

PM

on

the Court will rule on the motion,

fails

unopposed.

hearing

is

in

nature.

the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file a response to the

for

Thereafter,

Court

Under Local Rule 7.5, failure to respond to a motion

generally indicates that the motion is unopposed.

case

Defendant's

to

respond,

See LR 7.5,

SDGa.

the

Court

will

OCTOBER

2,

2014.

and if Plaintiff

deem

the

motion

ORDER
September,

ENTERED

at

Augusta,

Georgia,

this

/**

2014.

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

day

of