Brown v. United States Of America
Filing
10
ORDER adopting 8 Report and Recommendations; denying without an evidentiary hearing 1 Petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2255; denying a COA in this case. The Court closes this civil action and directs the Clerk to enter final judgment in favor of Respondent. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 12/08/2014. (thb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
FORACE RAHEEM BROWN,
Petitioner,
CV 113-168
v.
(Formerly CR 111-182)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
ORDER
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's
Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court
ADOPTS the Report and Recommendationof the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, and therefore
DENIES without an evidentiary hearing Petitioner's motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Further, a federal prisoner must obtain a certificate of appealability ("COA") before
appealing the denial of his motion to vacate. This Court "must issue or deny a certificate of
appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant." Rule 11(a) to the Rules
Governing Section2255 Proceedings. This Courtshould grant a COA only if the prisoner makes
a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). For the
reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, and in consideration of the standards
enunciated in Slack v. McDaniel. 529 U.S. 473, 482-84 (2000), Petitioner has failed to make the
requisite showing. Accordingly, the Court DENIES a COA in this case.1 Moreover, because
there are no non-frivolous issues to raise on appeal, an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
Accordingly, Petitioner is not entitled to appeal informapauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
Upon the foregoing, the Court CLOSES this civil action and DIRECTS the Clerk to
enter final judgment in favor of Respondent.
SO ORDERED this
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?