Vining v. Colvin
Filing
11
ORDER granting 10 Motion Entry of Judgment and Remand. The Commissioner's decision is reversed pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) and this action is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The Court directs the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of the Plaintiff and close this case. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 01/30/2015. (thb)
COI'RT FOR THE
THE T'NITED STATES DISTRICT
OF GEORGIA
SOTITHERN DISTRICT
AUGUSTA DIVISION
IN
MICHAEL DENNIS VINING,
Plaintiff,
cv 1l_4- 14 6
CAROLYN W. COLVIN.
Acting
Commissioner
Securi ty,
of
Social
Defendant.
ORDER
Presentl-y
motion
for
,fune
27,
this
entry
Court
deni
ed
20L4,
hi s
of
its
appropriate
and
sentence
\\-^
nnr.ror
6nf pr
record,
a
j udgment
decision
of
the
rcm:nd
and
The
in
action
the
commissioner's
(Doc.
remand.
Dennis
a decision
f ar
1.)
the
qrrnnl
Vining
of
the
remand of
case
the
has
should
case
10.)
filed
qa.'rlri
commissioner
this
no.
to
On
in
suit.
Commissioner
a]
Fmanf
consent
f v
tshat
Tncome
now indicated
reversaf
be the
the
aqencv
for
oroceedinqs.
Under
f ho
of
i a'rl- i.rrr
no.
is
Michaef
review
annl
decision
further
j udgment
Plaintiff
(Doc.
the
court
the
of
seeking
benefiLs.
thaL
before
i nn
pursuant
I hA
to
this
four
of
42 V.S.C.
f ho
rrr\-n
n- a:d'rnc
affirming,
Commissioner
f ar
provision
of
enrl
modifying
Social
the
Court
I ransr--inj-
or
Securitv,
'l
Upon due
Court
GRANTS the
rc'L.c'a r i na
the
S 405(S) ,
nf
reversing
with
or
has
lfig
the
without
consideration,
Commissioner's
motion.
(Doc. no.
pursuant
to
is
sentence
REMANDED
to
court
f urther
Pfaintiff
the
four
of
42 U.S.C.
Commissj-oner for
DIRECTS the
and cLosE this
ORDER ENrERED
January,
The Commissioner's
10).
at
clerk
to
decision
S 405(g)
REVERSED
and this
action
proceedings.
further
ente
is
i udcrment
in
The
f avor
of
case.
Augusta,
/]a^rd
i r
fhi
d
&
uuo or
201-5.
HO
I'NI
}{ALL
STATES DISTRICT .JUDGE
DISTRICT
OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?