Vining v. Colvin

Filing 11

ORDER granting 10 Motion Entry of Judgment and Remand. The Commissioner's decision is reversed pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) and this action is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The Court directs the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of the Plaintiff and close this case. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 01/30/2015. (thb)

Download PDF
COI'RT FOR THE THE T'NITED STATES DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SOTITHERN DISTRICT AUGUSTA DIVISION IN MICHAEL DENNIS VINING, Plaintiff, cv 1l_4- 14 6 CAROLYN W. COLVIN. Acting Commissioner Securi ty, of Social Defendant. ORDER Presentl-y motion for ,fune 27, this entry Court deni ed 20L4, hi s of its appropriate and sentence \\-^ nnr.ror 6nf pr record, a j udgment decision of the rcm:nd and The in action the commissioner's (Doc. remand. Dennis a decision f ar 1.) the qrrnnl Vining of the remand of case the has should case 10.) filed qa.'rlri commissioner this no. to On in suit. Commissioner a] Fmanf consent f v tshat Tncome now indicated reversaf be the the aqencv for oroceedinqs. Under f ho of i a'rl- i.rrr no. is Michaef review annl decision further j udgment Plaintiff (Doc. the court the of seeking benefiLs. thaL before i nn pursuant I hA to this four of 42 V.S.C. f ho rrr\-n n- a:d'rnc affirming, Commissioner f ar provision of enrl modifying Social the Court I ransr--inj- or Securitv, 'l Upon due Court GRANTS the rc'L.c'a r i na the S 405(S) , nf reversing with or has lfig the without consideration, Commissioner's motion. (Doc. no. pursuant to is sentence REMANDED to court f urther Pfaintiff the four of 42 U.S.C. Commissj-oner for DIRECTS the and cLosE this ORDER ENrERED January, The Commissioner's 10). at clerk to decision S 405(g) REVERSED and this action proceedings. further ente is i udcrment in The f avor of case. Augusta, /]a^rd i r fhi d & uuo or 201-5. HO I'NI }{ALL STATES DISTRICT .JUDGE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?