Clark v. Colvin
Filing
14
ORDER granting the Defendant's 13 Motion to Remand to the Commissioner of Social Security Administration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Court reverses the Commissioner's decision and remands this case for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 02/26/2015. (jah)
IN THE
UNITED
STATES
DISTRICT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
COURT
FOR THE
GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
HUGHSENIA CLARK,
*
Plaintiff,
*
v.
*
CV 114-171
*
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
*
Commissioner of Social
*
Security,
*
*
Defendant.
ORDER
Now before
the
Court
is
a
motion
filed by Defendant,
the
Acting Commissioner of Social Security, under sentence four of
42
U.S.C.
§ 405(g)
to
enter
a
judgment
of
remand
Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.
Defendant represents that "[u]pon remand,
will
direct
the
consideration
to
Administrative
the
claimant's
capacity
during
the
opinions,
and
explain
evidence."
entire
the
(Doc. 13-1 at 1.)
Law
to
the
(Doc. 13.)
the Appeals Council
Judge
maximum
to
give
residual
period
at
issue,
weight
given
to
further
functional
evaluate
such
all
opinion
The Court is further advised that
Plaintiff consents to this requested relief.
Based on the foregoing - and the plain language of sentence
four of § 405(g), which empowers this Court "to enter, upon the
pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming,
modifying,
Social
or
reversing
Security,
with
the
or
decision
without
rehearing" — the Commissioner's
GRANTED.
and
of
the
remanding
Commissioner
the
cause
unopposed motion
for
(doc.
13)
of
a
is
The Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner's decision
REMANDS
this
case
for
further
administrative
proceedings
pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
ORDER
February,
ENTERED
at
Augusta,
Georgia,
this
&><4P
day
2015.
HOMQEAB1E J.
RANDAL HALL
UNITED JBTATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?