Clark v. Colvin

Filing 14

ORDER granting the Defendant's 13 Motion to Remand to the Commissioner of Social Security Administration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Court reverses the Commissioner's decision and remands this case for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 02/26/2015. (jah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF COURT FOR THE GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION HUGHSENIA CLARK, * Plaintiff, * v. * CV 114-171 * CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting * Commissioner of Social * Security, * * Defendant. ORDER Now before the Court is a motion filed by Defendant, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to enter a judgment of remand Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Defendant represents that "[u]pon remand, will direct the consideration to Administrative the claimant's capacity during the opinions, and explain evidence." entire the (Doc. 13-1 at 1.) Law to the (Doc. 13.) the Appeals Council Judge maximum to give residual period at issue, weight given to further functional evaluate such all opinion The Court is further advised that Plaintiff consents to this requested relief. Based on the foregoing - and the plain language of sentence four of § 405(g), which empowers this Court "to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, Social or reversing Security, with the or decision without rehearing" — the Commissioner's GRANTED. and of the remanding Commissioner the cause unopposed motion for (doc. 13) of a is The Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner's decision REMANDS this case for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). ORDER February, ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this &><4P day 2015. HOMQEAB1E J. RANDAL HALL UNITED JBTATES DISTRICT JUDGE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA of

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?