Aliff et al v. Resurgent Capital Services, LP et al

Filing 50

ORDER directing the parties to file a response, if they wish, to the imposition of a stay. Compliance due by 5/12/2015. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 05/05/2015. (thb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION JAMES ALIFF and SAVANNAH DIANNE * McNORRILL, * on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, * * * Plaintiffs, * * * CV 114-198 * RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES and * LVNV FUNDING, * LLC, * Defendants. * ORDER On May 4, 2015, the Court stayed three cases on its docket pending the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Johnson v. Midland Funding, LLC, No. 15-11240 (11th Cir. Mar. 24, 2015) .x Upon review, the Court finds that a stay is equally appropriate in this matter. as Defendants point out in brief (Doc. 49), Plaintiffs' Indeed, argument that "acceptance" of payments on a time-barred debt constitutes a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA") separate and apart from filing the related time-barred proof of claim is identical to that presented in McNorrill v. Asset Acceptance, LLC, No. l:14-cv-210 (S.D. Ga. Nov. 7, 2014). Defendants similarly raise a statute of limitations defense. Nevertheless, the Court recognizes that the parties in this matter have not been afforded an opportunity to respond to the propriety of a 1 v. Ford v. Quantum3 Group, LLC et al. , No. l:15-cv-031, Doc. 7; McNorrill Asset Acceptance, LLC, No. l:14-cv-210, Doc. 29; Willis v. Cavalry Investments, LLC et al., No. l:14-cv-227# Doc. 34. stay. For response, that reason, each party shall have SEVEN DAYS if they wish, to the imposition of a stay. to file a Failure to file a response within seven days shall indicate there is no opposition to the Court's proposed course of action. ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this day of May, HONORftBfcB^jr RAND^t, HALL UNITED/ STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2015.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?