Aliff et al v. Resurgent Capital Services, LP et al
Filing
50
ORDER directing the parties to file a response, if they wish, to the imposition of a stay. Compliance due by 5/12/2015. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 05/05/2015. (thb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
JAMES ALIFF and SAVANNAH DIANNE
*
McNORRILL,
*
on behalf of
themselves and all
others
similarly situated,
*
*
*
Plaintiffs,
*
*
*
CV
114-198
*
RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES and
*
LVNV FUNDING,
*
LLC,
*
Defendants.
*
ORDER
On May 4, 2015, the Court stayed three cases on its docket pending
the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals'
decision in Johnson v. Midland
Funding, LLC, No. 15-11240 (11th Cir. Mar. 24, 2015) .x
Upon review, the
Court finds that a stay is equally appropriate in this matter.
as Defendants point out in brief (Doc. 49), Plaintiffs'
Indeed,
argument that
"acceptance" of payments on a time-barred debt constitutes a violation
of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
("FDCPA")
separate and apart
from filing the related time-barred proof of claim is identical to that
presented in McNorrill v. Asset Acceptance, LLC, No. l:14-cv-210 (S.D.
Ga. Nov. 7, 2014).
Defendants similarly raise a statute of limitations
defense.
Nevertheless, the Court recognizes that the parties in this matter
have not been afforded an opportunity to respond to the propriety of a
1
v.
Ford v. Quantum3 Group, LLC et al. , No. l:15-cv-031, Doc. 7; McNorrill
Asset Acceptance, LLC, No. l:14-cv-210, Doc. 29; Willis v. Cavalry
Investments, LLC et al., No. l:14-cv-227# Doc.
34.
stay.
For
response,
that
reason,
each party shall
have
SEVEN DAYS
if they wish, to the imposition of a stay.
to
file
a
Failure to file a
response within seven days shall indicate there is no opposition to the
Court's proposed course of action.
ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this
day of May,
HONORftBfcB^jr RAND^t, HALL
UNITED/ STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF
GEORGIA
2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?