Smith v. Augusta State Medical Prison et al

Filing 46

ORDER overruling both parties objections; adopting 33 Report and Recommendations; denying 19 Motion to Dismiss with respect to Plaintiff's claim against both Defendants in their individual capacities. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's official capacity claims for compensatory damages against Defendants. Defendants are require to file an answer to Plaintiff's complaint within fourteen days. The stay of discovery is lifted, and the Clerk shall issue a Scheduling Notice setting deadlines in this case upon Defendants' answer. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 09/10/2015. (thb)

Download PDF
-.. tl DISTzuCT COIJRT STATES IN THE LN.IITED OF DISTRICT GEORGIA FORTHE SOUTI-{ERN AUGT]STA DIVISION DUR,ANTEMARQUIS SMITH, Plaintift, cv 114-206 OFC,ERICA}IDREWS H{GINS, OFC.SYLVESTER an<i Defendants. {JRDER After a careful, de novo revier'vof the frle, the Corut concursrvith the Magistrate havebeenfiled (ckrc.nos. i6.40, to Judge'sReportand Recommendaticn, x,hich objections 41,42,,43). Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES both parties' objectionsand ADOPT$ of the Report and Recommendation the Magistrateludge as the opinion of the court. The damagesagainst capacityclaims for compensatory Court DISMISSES Piaintil?s o1-ficial and Det'erldants, IIENIES Defendants'motion to dismisswith respectto Plaintiff s claint are againstbottr Defendantsin their individual capacities. Defendants requiredto file an answer to Plaintiff s complaint u,ithirr fourteen days. See Fed. R. Civ. P. l2(d(aXe). th€ Furthermore, stay of discoverycurrently in place is lifted (doc. no. 25), ruid the Clerk shall issue a Scheduling Notice setting the deadlines in this case upon the lillttg of ansrver. Defendants' ' +/L 'day 2015,at Augrnta, Georgia. of September, SO ORDERED rhis10 ATES DISTRICT JUDGE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?