Taylor v. Augusta-Richmond County Consolidated Government, Commissioner(s), et.al. et al

Filing 64

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 59 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying Plaintiff's 61 Motion for Clarification; denying Plaintiff's 62 Motion for Hearing; and denying Plaintiff's 63 Motion for Permission to Appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/27/2016. (jah)

IN THE UNITED
FOR THE

STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION

WARREN ADAM TAYLOR,

*
*

Plaintiff,

*

v,

*

*
AUGUSTA-RICHMOND

COUNTY

CV

114-231

*

CONSOLIDATED COMMISSIONERS

*

et al.,

*

Defendants.

*
*

ORDER

In

this

Plaintiff
four

of

case,

has
these

Plaintiff's

which has been closed since April

repeatedly
motions

are

motion

motion

for

motion

a hearing

frivolous

pending

for

Plaintiff's

for

filed

on

motions.

the

clarification

(doc.

62);

and

(doc.

(4)

docket:

(1)

59);

(2)

(doc.

61);

2015,

Currently,

Court's

reconsideration

17,

(3)

Plaintiff's

Plaintiff's

motion to

appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5 (doc. 63).

With

respect

to

the

first

three

motions,

Plaintiff

essentially requests that the Court reconsider its prior Orders.
Because

Plaintiff

has

not

articulated

a

reason

for

the

do so, Plaintiff's motions (docs. 59, 61, 62) are DENIED.

Court

to

In

his

fourth

permission to appeal
5.

motion,

under

Plaintiff

Federal

Rule

asks

the

Court

of Appellate

Procedure

Assuming Plaintiff's motion is procedurally correct,

provided no reason justifying such an appeal.
Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion

ORDER ENTERED
October,

at

(doc.

Augusta,

for

he has

Accordingly,

the

63).

Georgia

this £>}r^ day

2016.

fNDAL HALL

UNITED/ STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-SOUTHERN

DISTRICT

OF GEORGIA

of