Taylor v. Augusta-Richmond County Consolidated Government, Commissioner(s), et.al. et al

Filing 88

ORDER denying 80 - 82 , 84 Motions. The Court imposes the following restriction on Plaintiff: The Clerk shall not docket any further motions or papers in this case except for a notice of appeal. Any papers referring to this case other than a no tice of appeal shall be returned to Plaintiff unfiled. If Plaintiff files a notice of appeal, the Clerk shall forward a copy of this Order, the notice of appeal, and the dismissed complaint to the Court of Appeals. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 03/06/2019. (maa)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION

WARREN ADAM TAYLOR,

*
*

Plaintiff,

*
5

V.

*

CV 114-231

*

AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY

*

CONSOLIDATED COMMISSIONERS, et

*

al.,

*
5

Defendants.

*

ORDER

The Court dismissed this case on April 17, 2015.
41.)

(Docs. 40,

Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration (Doc. 42), which

the Court denied (Doc. 46).

Plaintiff appealed the case (Doc.

43), and the Eleventh Circuit affirmed this Court's dismissal
(Docs.

48,

49).

Amongst

many

frivolous

filings.

Plaintiff

petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, which the
Supreme Court denied (Doc. 79).

There can be no doubt that the

case is closed.

The Court has denied as frivolous at least eight previous

motions.

(Docs. 59, 61-64, 66-69, 77.)

pending on the Court's docket.

Four motions are currently

Because the case is closed, the

Court DENIES Plaintiff's pending motions.

(Docs. 80-82, 84.)

In addition, in the Court's May 25, 2017 Order (Doc. 77), it
warned Plaintiff that if he continued to file frivolous motions.

the Court would deem him an abusive filer and his ability to seek
redress from the Court would be limited.

The Court will no longer

tolerate his frivolous filings because they impair the Court's

ability to adjudicate the legitimate claims of other litigants.
Accordingly,

THE

COURT

IMPOSES

THE

FOLLOWING

RESTRICTION

ON

PLAINTIFF: The Clerk SHALL NOT DOCKET any further motions or papers

in this case except for a notice of appeal.

Any papers referring

to this case other than a notice of appeal SHALL be returned to
Plaintiff unfiled.

If Plaintiff files a notice of appeal, the

Clerk SHALL forward a copy of this Order, the notice of appeal,
and the dismissed complaint to the Court of Appeals.

Plaintiff

shall remain responsible for appellate filing fees or he may move
this Court to grant IFP status on appeal.

ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this

of March,

2019.

[lEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF GEORGIA