Miller v. Rickard et al

Filing 5

ORDER that Defendant Danaher Corporation is ordered to provide sufficient evidence by 5:00 p.m. on January 21, 2015 that the jurisdictional amount is in controversy. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 1/7/2015. (jah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION JOHN MILLER, * * Plaintiff, * v. * CV 115-003 * LAUREN RICKARD; DANAHER * CORPORATION; BECKMAN COULTER, INC. a/k/a Beckman Coulter * * Diagnostics; and JOHN DOE, * Defendants. ORDER This Defendant cause comes Danaher before the Corporation Court removed on its this own initiative. action from the Superior Court of Columbia County pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. As instructed by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, "[flederal courts are obligated to inquire into subject-matter jurisdiction sua sponte whenever it may be lacking." Cadet v. Bulger, 377 F.3d 1173, 1179 (11th Cir. 2004) (internal quotation marks omitted). Upon review of the record, the Court cannot discern whether the amount in controversy in this case exceeds the jurisdictional requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Accordingly, Defendant Danaher Corporation is ORDERED to provide sufficient evidence by 5:00 p.m. on January 21, 2015 that the jurisdictional amount is in controversy. Defendant may rely on the "judicial admissions court, or other [], summary non-sworn letters judgment type submitted to evidence that may reveal that the amount in controversy requirement is satisfied." Pretka v. Kolter Cir. 2010) . are not City Other limited Corp., 14, No. of II, appropriate to, interrogatories, documentation Plaza forms affidavits, damages. 608 of Id. F.3d 744, evidence declarations, medical contracts, 3:12-cv-1086, Inc., at 2013 WL 3013864, but depositions, and Chewning at * 1 (11th include, records, 754-56; 754 (M.D. v. other Target Fla. June 2013). ORDER ENTERED January, at Augusta, Georgia this _/_*— day 2015. H0N0RA8SE J. RANDAL HALL UNITED/STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA of

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?