Miller v. Rickard et al
Filing
5
ORDER that Defendant Danaher Corporation is ordered to provide sufficient evidence by 5:00 p.m. on January 21, 2015 that the jurisdictional amount is in controversy. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 1/7/2015. (jah)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
JOHN MILLER,
*
*
Plaintiff,
*
v.
*
CV 115-003
*
LAUREN RICKARD;
DANAHER
*
CORPORATION; BECKMAN COULTER,
INC. a/k/a Beckman Coulter
*
*
Diagnostics; and JOHN DOE,
*
Defendants.
ORDER
This
Defendant
cause
comes
Danaher
before
the
Corporation
Court
removed
on
its
this
own
initiative.
action
from
the
Superior Court of Columbia County pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
As
instructed
by
the
Eleventh
Circuit
Court
of
Appeals,
"[flederal courts are obligated to inquire into subject-matter
jurisdiction sua sponte whenever it may be lacking."
Cadet v.
Bulger, 377 F.3d 1173, 1179 (11th Cir. 2004) (internal quotation
marks omitted).
Upon review of the record,
the Court cannot
discern whether the amount in controversy in this case exceeds
the jurisdictional requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Accordingly,
Defendant
Danaher Corporation
is ORDERED
to
provide sufficient evidence by 5:00 p.m. on January 21, 2015
that the jurisdictional amount is in controversy.
Defendant may
rely on
the
"judicial admissions
court,
or
other
[],
summary
non-sworn letters
judgment
type
submitted to
evidence
that
may
reveal that the amount in controversy requirement is satisfied."
Pretka
v.
Kolter
Cir.
2010) .
are
not
City
Other
limited
Corp.,
14,
No.
of
II,
appropriate
to,
interrogatories,
documentation
Plaza
forms
affidavits,
damages.
608
of
Id.
F.3d
744,
evidence
declarations,
medical
contracts,
3:12-cv-1086,
Inc.,
at
2013 WL 3013864,
but
depositions,
and
Chewning
at * 1
(11th
include,
records,
754-56;
754
(M.D.
v.
other
Target
Fla.
June
2013).
ORDER ENTERED
January,
at
Augusta,
Georgia
this
_/_*— day
2015.
H0N0RA8SE J.
RANDAL HALL
UNITED/STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?