Taylor v. United States Department of Labor et al
Filing
10
ORDER allowing the plaintiff additional time to serve the U.S. Attorney, the complaint and summons. (Compliance due by 10/21/2015). Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 9/21/15. (cmr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
CALETHA D. TAYLOR,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
LABOR, et al.,
Defendants
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
_________
CV 115-049
ORDER
_________
On August 20, 2015 the Court directed Plaintiff to show cause as to why the Defendants
in this action have not been served. (Doc. no. 8.) On September 9, 2015, Plaintiff responded to
the Court’s order and explained that she believed she had properly served the Defendants
according to the Court’s prior Order. (Doc. no. 9.) However, it appears that Plaintiff has failed
to deliver a copy of the summons and complaint to the civil-process clerk of the United States
Attorney’s office for the Southern District of Georgia. (See id. at 2.) Instead, she mistakenly
delivered the copies to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia. (Id.) Given
Plaintiff’s pro se status, the Court will give her until October 21, 2015 to deliver a summons and
complaint to the civil-process clerk of the United States Attorney’s office for the Southern
District of Georgia and properly complete service upon Defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m);
Horenkamp v. Van Winkle & Co., 402 F.3d 1129, 1132 (11th Cir. 2005) (permitting extension of
120-day service period, even in absence of good cause).
SO ORDERED this 21st day of September, 2015, at Augusta, Georgia.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?