Nurse v. Teleperformance Inc. et al
Filing
23
ORDER denying 13 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 19 Motion for Corrective Court Documentation on a Pleading Plaintiff; denying 20 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 22 Motion to Strike the 16 Amended Complaint. The Court directs the Clerk to Strike Document Entry 16, Plaintiff's Amended Complaint from the record. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 01/11/2016. (thb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
RONALD A.
*
NURSE,
Plaintiff,
*
V.
*
*
TELEPERFORMANCE INC.;
WEST; TRACEE JOHNSON,
VERONICA
*
l:15-cv-94
*
Defendants.
*
ORDER
In this rapidly expanding case, the Court presently faces five
pending motions,
Defendants'
for
motion
default
default
all filed since December 7,
to
dismiss
judgment
judgment
(Doc.
Court Documentation'7
In this order,
(Doc.
(Doc.
13),
20),
(Doc.
7),
Plaintiff's
first
second
"Motion
and Defendants'
the Court resolves
They include:
Plaintiff's
Plaintiff's
19),
2015.
motion
motion
for
for
Corrective
motion to strike.
the latter four motions
and
leaves Defendants' motion to dismiss pending.
The
judgment.
Plaintiff,
Court
begins
(Docs.
13,
with
20).
proceeding pro se,
Plaintiff's
motions
In each default
for
default
judgment motion,
makes a nearly identical argument,
which takes the following form:
1. If Defendants execute waivers of service of process, Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 12 (a) (1) (A) (ii)
requires Defendants to
answer within 60 days after the waiver requests were sent;
2. Defendants were sent waiver requests on October 7, 2015;
3. Defendants each waived service of process;
4. Defendants'
deadline to answer was December 7, 2015;
5. Defendants have not answered;
6. ergo default judgment should be granted.
Plaintiff s
ignores
argument
multiple
is
a
sound,
rules
of
logical
civil
syllogism—except
procedure.
Most
that
it
notably,
Defendants timely filed their motion to dismiss on December 7th1
and,
under
Rule
12(a)(4),
they
are
not
required
to
answer
until
j
fourteen days after notice of the Court's action on their motion to
dismiss,
to
should it be
plead,
default
see
Fed.
denied.
R.
Civ.
P.
is
judgment,
not
Court
Court
Documentation"
(Doc. 22) .
as
the
was
not
entry of default,
Plaintiff's
failed
much less
motions
for
13, 20) are therefore DENIED.
addresses
Plaintiff's
(Doc.
and
19)
"Motion for Corrective
Defendant's
"Amended
intended
Complaint."
Motion
to be
an
exhibit
Plaintiff
to his
opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss.
the
have
to
Strike.
Both motions concern Docket Entry 16, which is styled
Plaintiff's
filing
55(a),
Defendants
warranted.
default judgment (Docs.
Next,
Because
"Amended
Complaint"
filed
at
Docket
indicates
response
this
brief
in
As both parties note,
Entry
16
is
an
exact
duplicate of the correctly filed Amended Complaint at Docket Entry
5.
Plaintiff
filed
the
1
requests
"Amended
Plaintiff
is
that
Complaint"
correct
the
Court
and
that
disregard
include
Defendant's
it
as
motion
the
an
to
mistakenly
exhibit
to
dismiss
is
actually filed sixty-one days after the waiver requests were sent out.
The sixtieth day, however, was Sunday, December 6, 2015.
When a
filing deadline falls on a Sunday, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
6(a)(1)(C) provides that the deadline shall be the next business day.
Plaintiff's
move
to
response motion.
strike
the
Defendants,
Complaint,"
"Amended
for their
or
part,
simply
alternatively
grant
Plaintiff's request to make it an exhibit to Plaintiff's response
brief.
Upon due consideration,
strike
and
DENIES
Documentation."
Entry
the
16,
Court
considers
without
the
brief,
a
Court
Plaintiff's
Plaintiff's
Plaintiff
Plaintiff's
The
review
need
wishes
citation
the Court GRANTS Defendants'
DIRECTS
Amended
to
the
it
be
cite
that
Motion
to
Complaint
filed
to
refers
his
to
as
Corrective
to
STRIKE
from the
Dismiss,
filed
an
at
the
Document
To
in
Complaint
When
Court
Docket
Complaint
Amended
Court
record.
exhibit.
Amended
the
for
Clerk
"Amended Complaint,"
Defendants'
for
"Motion
motion to
will
Entry
5
the
extent
a
future
at
docket
entry five is sufficient and there is no need to include it as an
exhibit.
ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this
//^day of January,
2016.
HONORABH2
J.
RANEAL
HALL
UNITED SPATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN
DISTRICT
OF
GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?