Nurse v. Teleperformance Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER denying 13 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 19 Motion for Corrective Court Documentation on a Pleading Plaintiff; denying 20 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 22 Motion to Strike the 16 Amended Complaint. The Court directs the Clerk to Strike Document Entry 16, Plaintiff's Amended Complaint from the record. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 01/11/2016. (thb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION RONALD A. * NURSE, Plaintiff, * V. * * TELEPERFORMANCE INC.; WEST; TRACEE JOHNSON, VERONICA * l:15-cv-94 * Defendants. * ORDER In this rapidly expanding case, the Court presently faces five pending motions, Defendants' for motion default default all filed since December 7, to dismiss judgment judgment (Doc. Court Documentation'7 In this order, (Doc. (Doc. 13), 20), (Doc. 7), Plaintiff's first second "Motion and Defendants' the Court resolves They include: Plaintiff's Plaintiff's 19), 2015. motion motion for for Corrective motion to strike. the latter four motions and leaves Defendants' motion to dismiss pending. The judgment. Plaintiff, Court begins (Docs. 13, with 20). proceeding pro se, Plaintiff's motions In each default for default judgment motion, makes a nearly identical argument, which takes the following form: 1. If Defendants execute waivers of service of process, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 (a) (1) (A) (ii) requires Defendants to answer within 60 days after the waiver requests were sent; 2. Defendants were sent waiver requests on October 7, 2015; 3. Defendants each waived service of process; 4. Defendants' deadline to answer was December 7, 2015; 5. Defendants have not answered; 6. ergo default judgment should be granted. Plaintiff s ignores argument multiple is a sound, rules of logical civil syllogism—except procedure. Most that it notably, Defendants timely filed their motion to dismiss on December 7th1 and, under Rule 12(a)(4), they are not required to answer until j fourteen days after notice of the Court's action on their motion to dismiss, to should it be plead, default see Fed. denied. R. Civ. P. is judgment, not Court Court Documentation" (Doc. 22) . as the was not entry of default, Plaintiff's failed much less motions for 13, 20) are therefore DENIED. addresses Plaintiff's (Doc. and 19) "Motion for Corrective Defendant's "Amended intended Complaint." Motion to be an exhibit Plaintiff to his opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss. the have to Strike. Both motions concern Docket Entry 16, which is styled Plaintiff's filing 55(a), Defendants warranted. default judgment (Docs. Next, Because "Amended Complaint" filed at Docket indicates response this brief in As both parties note, Entry 16 is an exact duplicate of the correctly filed Amended Complaint at Docket Entry 5. Plaintiff filed the 1 requests "Amended Plaintiff is that Complaint" correct the Court and that disregard include Defendant's it as motion the an to mistakenly exhibit to dismiss is actually filed sixty-one days after the waiver requests were sent out. The sixtieth day, however, was Sunday, December 6, 2015. When a filing deadline falls on a Sunday, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a)(1)(C) provides that the deadline shall be the next business day. Plaintiff's move to response motion. strike the Defendants, Complaint," "Amended for their or part, simply alternatively grant Plaintiff's request to make it an exhibit to Plaintiff's response brief. Upon due consideration, strike and DENIES Documentation." Entry the 16, Court considers without the brief, a Court Plaintiff's Plaintiff's Plaintiff Plaintiff's The review need wishes citation the Court GRANTS Defendants' DIRECTS Amended to the it be cite that Motion to Complaint filed to refers his to as Corrective to STRIKE from the Dismiss, filed an at the Document To in Complaint When Court Docket Complaint Amended Court record. exhibit. Amended the for Clerk "Amended Complaint," Defendants' for "Motion motion to will Entry 5 the extent a future at docket entry five is sufficient and there is no need to include it as an exhibit. ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this //^day of January, 2016. HONORABH2 J. RANEAL HALL UNITED SPATES DISTRICT JUDGE IN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?