Evans v. Strayer University

Filing 12

ORDER denying 7 Motion to Dismiss; denying 9 Motion for Default Judgment.The Court Orders Plaintiff to properly serve Defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The Court further Orders Plaintiff to file notice with this Co urt of service of process within 14 days of the date of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to properly serve Defendant and give notice within 14 days of this Order, the Court will dismiss Plaintiff's complaint and close this case. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/03/2016. (thb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION STACIE ELAINE EVANS, * Plaintiff, * * * v. CV 115-196 * STRAYER UNIVERSITY, * Defendant. * * * ORDER Plaintiff, employer, proceeding pro se, accuses Defendant, of racial discrimination, her former sexual discrimination, and retaliation - all potential violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Currently, the parties are engaged in a procedural dispute in which the Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss (doc. 7) and Plaintiff has filed a motion for default judgment (doc. 9) . The motions present three procedural issues: (1) Is Plaintiff entitled to a Default Judgment under Rule 55?; (2) Did Plaintiff timely file her complaint in this Court?; and (3) Does Plaintiff's failure to properly serve Defendant warrant dismissal under 12(b)(5)? For Federal the Rule following of Civil reasons, the Procedure Court 4 (m) finds or that Plaintiff is not entitled to a Default Judgment; Plaintiff did timely file her complaint; and Plaintiff's failure to properly serve Defendant Because the heavily upon does issues the not warrant in dispute filing dismissal — in are procedural dates of various this ones instance. that documents, the depend Court briefly recounts the short history of this case. I. Plaintiff began her Discrimination with the ("EEOC") . to-sue BACKGROUND litigation Equal by Employment filing a Charge of Opportunity Commission The EEOC rejected her claim and mailed her a right- letter on September 10, 2015. (Doc. 1.) The notice contained explicit instructions informing Plaintiff that she had ninety days to file a complaint in state else she would lose her right to sue. or federal court or Plaintiff filed suit in this Court on December 14, 2015, ninety-five days after the EEOC mailed her notice. On December (Doc. 15, 1.) 2015, this Court issued a detailed order explaining the basic rules of litigation and informing Plaintiff that she had ninety days to serve Defendant or risk dismissal of her case. Defendant (Doc. 5.) Plaintiff failed within the ninety-day deadline. to properly Thus, serve on April 21, 2016, this Court issued another order giving Plaintiff fourteen days to explain why she had not yet served Defendant. Also on April 21, complaint (Doc. 7.) because (Doc. 6.) Defendant moved to dismiss Plaintiff's Plaintiff had not timely served Defendant. In its motion, Defendant admitted that Plaintiff had attempted to serve it on March 30, but had not done so properly. On April 26, to respond (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff filed a "Response to Motion" that seemed to the order this In her motion, Court issued five days prior. Plaintiff alleged that nothing in the order issued December 15 stated that she had only ninety days to serve had 120 of the fact that she had attempted to serve Defendant on March 30. On days May Defendant to and that effectuate 10, Plaintiff the Clerk's service. filed Office Plaintiff a motion for told made her no default mention judgment basis that Defendant failed to timely respond to (Doc. the her complaint. DISCUSSION Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment The Court judgment. first, first addresses the plaintiff default, States 198013, Plaintiff's motion for default "Obtaining a default judgment is a two-step process: must clerk of court; and second, 55). on 9.) . II. A. she the v. plaintiff $11,000.00 in entry of of default from the after the clerk has made an entry of can at *2 (M.D. Ga. "An seek an entry seek a default U.S. Jan. Funds, 27, default No. 2009) judgment." United 5:08-CV-102, (citing Fed. and subsequent entry 2009 WL R. Civ. P. of default judgment are appropriate Mw]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative otherwise relief defend.'" is Id. (alteration in original). sought (quoting has Fed. failed R. to Civ. plead P. or 55(a)) Plaintiff is not entitled to a default judgment because she has not obtained an entry of default. obtain one, because Defendant attempted to defend. Thus, has Nor will she be appeared the Court denies in this able to case Plaintiff's and Motion for Default Judgment. B. Defendant's Motion The Court Defendant now makes to Dismiss addresses three Defendant's arguments that dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff's suit is within ninety days letter. Second, dismissal without that Defendant because Plaintiff a showing Plaintiff's dismissal under day Rule to to claims she to failed to 4 (m) Defendant Court suit right-to-sue serve timely serve process The file necessitates timely Third, 12(b)(5). justify Defendant argues that Rule failed dismiss. believes she received her of good cause. failure it First, time-barred because from the motion process maintains also warrants finds none of Defendant's arguments persuasive. First, timely file evidence, days contrary a this after the to Defendant's complaint Court EEOC with this assertion, Court. Plaintiff Absent did contrary presumes the date of receipt to be three mails a right-to-sue letter. Kerr v. McDonald's Corp., 427 F.3d 947, 953 n.9 (11th Cir. 2005) ("When the date of the receipt is in dispute, this court (sic) has applied a presumption of three days for receipt by mail ....") (citations omitted) . Application of this rule puts the due date for Plaintiff's complaint on December 12, 2015: a Saturday. Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a)(1) "Saturday, Sunday, states that if the due date is or legal holiday, holiday." complaint was Thus, Monday, the proper December a the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, legal Federal due 15, date 2015. for Sunday, or Plaintiff's Because Plaintiff filed her complaint on December 15, her complaint was timely. Second, complaint the Court because of is not obligated untimely to service. dismiss Federal Plaintiff's Rule of Civil Procedure 4 (m) gives the Court two options if a plaintiff fails to defendant serve either "dismiss defendant time." the the or the order Plaintiff prefers has action that Fed. R. Civ. Court within ninety days. without service be prejudice made the latter time option. to properly se litigants, Loren v. Plaintiff instructions. a that specified In this instance, serve because Defendant, the argument. that its patience with Plaintiff While this Court grants some leniency to pro Plaintiff Sasser, must however, must against Additionally, Court denies as moot Defendant's 12(b)(5) The Court notes, Court within P. 4 (m) (emphasis added). additional is not unlimited. The must 309 also pay Contrary F.3d conform to 1296, careful to procedural 1304 (11th attention Plaintiff's clearly instructed Plaintiff to serve days of the filing of her complaint. to Cir. this assertion, Defendant rules. See 2002). Court's this Court within ninety (Doc. 5 at 2 ("Plaintiff must serve complaint Defendant was filed, dismissal of serve within and ninety failure to do Defendant or the Defendant and file days from the so may result entire case.").) evidence of service with to properly Civil reasons mentioned above, Dismiss serve Procedure date of Defendant 4. this and (doc. 7) . Defendant notice with this the the Court Failure to do CONCLUSION the Court DENIES both the Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Motion in the in dismissal of this case. III. For the her Plaintiff must within fourteen days from the date of this order. so will result date The in Order. further service of If notice Court accordance Court Court of give The (doc. 14 and Defendant's ORDERS with ORDERS Plaintiff Federal Plaintiff Rule to to of file process within 14 DAYS of Plaintiff within 9) fails DAYS of to properly this serve Order, the Court will dismiss Plaintiff's complaint and close this case. ORDER October, ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this o>_j 2016. HONORABEE J. UNITED STATES JTHERN RAN0AL HALL DISTRICT DISTRICT JUDGE OF GEORGIA day of

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?