Evans v. Strayer University
Filing
12
ORDER denying 7 Motion to Dismiss; denying 9 Motion for Default Judgment.The Court Orders Plaintiff to properly serve Defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The Court further Orders Plaintiff to file notice with this Co urt of service of process within 14 days of the date of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to properly serve Defendant and give notice within 14 days of this Order, the Court will dismiss Plaintiff's complaint and close this case. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/03/2016. (thb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
STACIE ELAINE EVANS,
*
Plaintiff,
*
*
*
v.
CV 115-196
*
STRAYER UNIVERSITY,
*
Defendant.
*
*
*
ORDER
Plaintiff,
employer,
proceeding pro se,
accuses Defendant,
of racial discrimination,
her former
sexual discrimination,
and
retaliation - all potential violations of Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964.
Currently,
the parties are engaged in a
procedural dispute in which the Defendant has filed a motion to
dismiss
(doc.
7)
and Plaintiff
has filed a motion for default
judgment (doc. 9) . The motions present three procedural issues:
(1)
Is Plaintiff entitled to a Default Judgment under Rule 55?;
(2) Did Plaintiff timely file her complaint in this Court?; and
(3) Does Plaintiff's failure to properly serve Defendant warrant
dismissal
under
12(b)(5)?
For
Federal
the
Rule
following
of
Civil
reasons,
the
Procedure
Court
4 (m)
finds
or
that
Plaintiff is not entitled to a Default Judgment; Plaintiff did
timely file her complaint; and Plaintiff's failure to properly
serve
Defendant
Because
the
heavily
upon
does
issues
the
not
warrant
in dispute
filing
dismissal
—
in
are procedural
dates
of
various
this
ones
instance.
that
documents,
the
depend
Court
briefly recounts the short history of this case.
I.
Plaintiff
began
her
Discrimination with the
("EEOC") .
to-sue
BACKGROUND
litigation
Equal
by
Employment
filing
a
Charge
of
Opportunity Commission
The EEOC rejected her claim and mailed her a right-
letter
on
September
10,
2015.
(Doc.
1.)
The
notice
contained explicit instructions informing Plaintiff that she had
ninety days
to
file
a
complaint
in
state
else she would lose her right to sue.
or
federal
court
or
Plaintiff filed suit in
this Court on December 14, 2015, ninety-five days after the EEOC
mailed her notice.
On
December
(Doc.
15,
1.)
2015,
this
Court
issued a detailed order
explaining the basic rules of litigation and informing Plaintiff
that she had ninety days to serve Defendant or risk dismissal of
her
case.
Defendant
(Doc.
5.)
Plaintiff
failed
within the ninety-day deadline.
to
properly
Thus,
serve
on April
21,
2016, this Court issued another order giving Plaintiff fourteen
days to explain why she had not yet served Defendant.
Also on April 21,
complaint
(Doc. 7.)
because
(Doc. 6.)
Defendant moved to dismiss Plaintiff's
Plaintiff had not
timely served Defendant.
In its motion, Defendant admitted that Plaintiff had
attempted to serve it on March 30, but had not done so properly.
On April 26,
to
respond
(Doc. 8.)
Plaintiff filed a "Response to Motion" that seemed
to
the
order
this
In her motion,
Court
issued
five
days
prior.
Plaintiff alleged that nothing in the
order issued December 15 stated that she had only ninety days to
serve
had
120
of
the
fact that she had attempted to serve Defendant on March 30.
On
days
May
Defendant
to
and
that
effectuate
10,
Plaintiff
the
Clerk's
service.
filed
Office
Plaintiff
a motion
for
told
made
her
no
default
mention
judgment
basis that Defendant failed to timely respond to
(Doc.
the
her complaint.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment
The
Court
judgment.
first,
first
addresses
the plaintiff
default,
States
198013,
Plaintiff's
motion
for
default
"Obtaining a default judgment is a two-step process:
must
clerk of court; and second,
55).
on
9.) .
II.
A.
she
the
v.
plaintiff
$11,000.00
in
entry
of
of
default
from the
after the clerk has made an entry of
can
at *2 (M.D. Ga.
"An
seek an entry
seek a default
U.S.
Jan.
Funds,
27,
default
No.
2009)
judgment."
United
5:08-CV-102,
(citing Fed.
and subsequent
entry
2009
WL
R.
Civ.
P.
of
default
judgment are appropriate Mw]hen a party against whom a judgment
for
affirmative
otherwise
relief
defend.'"
is
Id.
(alteration in original).
sought
(quoting
has
Fed.
failed
R.
to
Civ.
plead
P.
or
55(a))
Plaintiff is not entitled to a default judgment because she
has
not obtained an entry of default.
obtain
one,
because
Defendant
attempted to defend.
Thus,
has
Nor will she be
appeared
the Court
denies
in
this
able to
case
Plaintiff's
and
Motion
for Default Judgment.
B.
Defendant's Motion
The
Court
Defendant
now
makes
to Dismiss
addresses
three
Defendant's
arguments
that
dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint.
Plaintiff's
suit
is
within ninety days
letter.
Second,
dismissal
without
that
Defendant
because
Plaintiff
a showing
Plaintiff's
dismissal
under
day
Rule
to
to
claims
she
to
failed to
4 (m)
Defendant
Court
suit
right-to-sue
serve
timely serve process
The
file
necessitates
timely
Third,
12(b)(5).
justify
Defendant argues that
Rule
failed
dismiss.
believes
she received her
of good cause.
failure
it
First,
time-barred because
from the
motion
process
maintains
also warrants
finds
none
of
Defendant's arguments persuasive.
First,
timely
file
evidence,
days
contrary
a
this
after
the
to
Defendant's
complaint
Court
EEOC
with
this
assertion,
Court.
Plaintiff
Absent
did
contrary
presumes the date of receipt to be three
mails
a
right-to-sue
letter.
Kerr v.
McDonald's Corp., 427 F.3d 947, 953 n.9 (11th Cir. 2005) ("When the
date of the receipt is in dispute, this court (sic) has applied a
presumption of three days for receipt by mail ....") (citations
omitted) .
Application
of this
rule
puts
the
due
date
for
Plaintiff's complaint on December 12, 2015: a Saturday.
Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a)(1)
"Saturday,
Sunday,
states that if the due date is
or legal holiday,
holiday."
complaint
was
Thus,
Monday,
the
proper
December
a
the period continues to run
until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday,
legal
Federal
due
15,
date
2015.
for
Sunday, or
Plaintiff's
Because
Plaintiff
filed her complaint on December 15, her complaint was timely.
Second,
complaint
the
Court
because
of
is
not
obligated
untimely
to
service.
dismiss
Federal
Plaintiff's
Rule
of
Civil
Procedure 4 (m)
gives the Court two options if a plaintiff fails
to
defendant
serve
either
"dismiss
defendant
time."
the
the
or
the
order
Plaintiff
prefers
has
action
that
Fed. R. Civ.
Court
within
ninety
days.
without
service
be
prejudice
made
the
latter
time
option.
to
properly
se
litigants,
Loren
v.
Plaintiff
instructions.
a
that
specified
In this instance,
serve
because
Defendant,
the
argument.
that its
patience with Plaintiff
While this Court grants some leniency to pro
Plaintiff
Sasser,
must
however,
must
against
Additionally,
Court denies as moot Defendant's 12(b)(5)
The Court notes,
Court
within
P. 4 (m) (emphasis added).
additional
is not unlimited.
The
must
309
also
pay
Contrary
F.3d
conform to
1296,
careful
to
procedural
1304
(11th
attention
Plaintiff's
clearly instructed Plaintiff to serve
days of the filing of her complaint.
to
Cir.
this
assertion,
Defendant
rules.
See
2002).
Court's
this
Court
within ninety
(Doc. 5 at 2 ("Plaintiff
must
serve
complaint
Defendant
was
filed,
dismissal of
serve
within
and
ninety
failure to do
Defendant or the
Defendant
and
file
days
from
the
so may
result
entire case.").)
evidence
of
service
with
to
properly
Civil
reasons mentioned above,
Dismiss
serve
Procedure
date
of
Defendant
4.
this
and
(doc.
7) .
Defendant
notice with this
the
the
Court
Failure to do
CONCLUSION
the Court DENIES both the
Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment
Motion
in the
in dismissal of this case.
III.
For the
her
Plaintiff must
within fourteen days from the date of this order.
so will result
date
The
in
Order.
further
service of
If
notice
Court
accordance
Court
Court of
give
The
(doc.
14
and Defendant's
ORDERS
with
ORDERS
Plaintiff
Federal
Plaintiff
Rule
to
to
of
file
process within 14 DAYS of
Plaintiff
within
9)
fails
DAYS
of
to
properly
this
serve
Order,
the
Court will dismiss Plaintiff's complaint and close this case.
ORDER
October,
ENTERED
at
Augusta,
Georgia,
this
o>_j
2016.
HONORABEE J.
UNITED STATES
JTHERN
RAN0AL HALL
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
JUDGE
OF GEORGIA
day
of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?