Usry v. Equityexperts.org, LLC

Filing 76

ORDER Directing Plaintiffs to refile 61 MOTION to Certify Class so that all citations to exhibits are properly labeled. Plaintiffs shall not make any substantive changes to their brief or exhibits. (Compliance due by 1/16/2018.) Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 1/11/2018. (pts)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION SARAH USRY and DANIEL DARNELL, on behalf of themselves and * * all others similarly situated, * * l:16-cv-010 Plaintiffs, v. * EQUITY EXPERTS.ORG, LLC d/b/a * EQUITY EXPERTS, Defendant. ORDER Presently before the Court is Certification Plaintiffs, and Supporting however, electronically have filed exhibits cited in their motion. motion, Plaintiffs For cite to Plaintiffs' Memorandum not to of Motion for Class Law. correctly correspond example, (Doc. labeled with the their exhibits on page 5 of Plaintiffs' "Addendum Exh. 7: Defendant's Responses to Plaintiff's Second Set of Interrogatories, 6" and "Addendum Exh. 84-86, 87-90, 4: Galofaro 96-99." (Doc. electronically filed record, 61.) Dep. 61 at at 6-72, 5.) 74-79, But, Nos. 181-83, on Exhibit 7 iis the Expert Report of Wright McLeod and Exhibit 4 is the Affadavit of Sarah Usry. Galofaro Deposition is the actually Exhibit 12 and The Defendant's Responses to be to Plaintiff's Exhibit so Plaintiffs that all labelled to Plaintiffs motion. Set of Interrogatories ensure that the record is appears 6. Accordingly, ORDERS Second to to refile their motiori for class citations to correspond SHALL clear, have Plaintiffs exhibits with until SHALL the in electronically make Court certification their motion are properly January NOT the 16, any filed 2018, to exhibits. refile substantive their changes to i their brief or exhibits. ORDER ENTERED at | Augusta, Georgia, day this i January, 2018. j JUDGE STATES HERN DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT OF GEORGIA of

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?