Castillo v. Mills et al

Filing 24

ORDER denying 23 Motion to "resend" objections. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 4/18/17. (cmr)

THE

UNITED

STATES

DISTRICT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT

OF

COURT

FOR THE

GEORGIA

AUGUSTA DIVISION

CHARLIE HENRY CASTILLO,

*

Plaintiff,

*

v.

FNU MILLS,

*

et al.,

CV

116-076

*
•

Defendants.

*

ORDER

After vacating a prior Judgment

in this case because the

Court received late objections to the United States Magistrate

Judge's Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff was given additional

time to file objections-until March 3, 2017.1
filed.

In fact,

No objections were

objections were not even filed in the thirty-

days after the filing deadline as this Court adopted the Report
and

Recommendation

on

April

3,

2017,

with

no

objections.

Plaintiff's case was dismissed on April 3, 2017.

Ten days later, Plaintiff filed a letter complaining that he
has had mail issues at his prison.

Plaintiff also claims to have

already sent his objections to the Court.

Plaintiff asks that he

be allowed to "resend" his objections.

Plaintiff had ample time to submit his objections to the

1

Objections

to

the

Report

originally due on December 19, 2016.

and Recommendation

were

Report

and Recommendation,

2016.

Importantly,

the

which was

Court

entered on November

forewarned

Plaintiff

further extensions for objections would be given.
Feb.

16, 2017, Doc.

evidence

of

mail

20.)

that

30,

no

(See Order of

His present filing, which contains no

interference

other

then

his

conclusory

allegation, does not alter the fact that Plaintiff had ample time
to object to the Report and Recommendation.
Upon

the

foregoing,

Plaintiff's

motion

to

"resend"

the

objections to the Report and Recommendation (doc. 23) is DENIED,

ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this _/^_j day of April,
2017.

HONCSAHLrE^J.

RANDAL HALL

UNITED/STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
_SQIJTHfiRN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA