Castillo v. Mills et al
ORDER denying 23 Motion to "resend" objections. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 4/18/17. (cmr)
CHARLIE HENRY CASTILLO,
After vacating a prior Judgment
in this case because the
Court received late objections to the United States Magistrate
Judge's Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff was given additional
time to file objections-until March 3, 2017.1
No objections were
objections were not even filed in the thirty-
days after the filing deadline as this Court adopted the Report
Plaintiff's case was dismissed on April 3, 2017.
Ten days later, Plaintiff filed a letter complaining that he
has had mail issues at his prison.
Plaintiff also claims to have
already sent his objections to the Court.
Plaintiff asks that he
be allowed to "resend" his objections.
Plaintiff had ample time to submit his objections to the
originally due on December 19, 2016.
entered on November
further extensions for objections would be given.
16, 2017, Doc.
(See Order of
His present filing, which contains no
allegation, does not alter the fact that Plaintiff had ample time
to object to the Report and Recommendation.
objections to the Report and Recommendation (doc. 23) is DENIED,
ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this _/^_j day of April,
UNITED/STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
_SQIJTHfiRN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?