Textron Inc. et al v. Traxxas LP, et al
Filing
24
ORDER denying 23 Motion to administratively close case. Instead, the Court will Stay this matter for 45 days. If, at the end of this stay, the parties have settled, then they should file a stipulation of dismissal. If, however, the parties have been unable to resolve this matter by the end of the stay, Defendant is instructed to file their answer. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 9/2/16. (cmr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
TEXTRON,
INC.
and TEXTRON
SPECIALIZED VEHICLES,
*
INC.,
*
*
Plaintiffs,
*
*
v.
*
TRAXXAS,
LP,
and DOES 1-10,
CV 116-081
*
*
Defendants.
*
*
*
ORDER
Presently before the Court is the parties'
to Close this Case Administratively.
the
parties
represent
that
they
(Doc.
are
Consent Motion
23.)
currently
settlement discussions and that Defendant Traxxas,
better
spent
continuing
these
answer,
which is due today.
discussions
than
Specifically,
engaged
in
LP's time is
filing
its
So they request that the Court
administratively close the case.
Instead,
the Court will STAY
this matter for forty-five days.
If, at the end of this stay,
the parties have settled, then they should file a stipulation of
dismissal.
If, however, the parties have been unable to resolve
this matter by the end of the stay, Defendant is instructed to
file their answer.
Within ten days from that date, the parties
must conduct their Rule 26(f)
conference,
and they must file
their Rule
26(f)
report within five days
from the
date
of the
meeting.
ORDER
September,
ENTERED
at
Augusta,
sta,
Georgia
this ^p^ "^
^2^__
day
2016.
J.
RANDAL HALL
UNITETJ jSTATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SOUTHERN
DISTRICT
OF GEORGIA
of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?