Textron Inc. et al v. Traxxas LP, et al

Filing 24

ORDER denying 23 Motion to administratively close case. Instead, the Court will Stay this matter for 45 days. If, at the end of this stay, the parties have settled, then they should file a stipulation of dismissal. If, however, the parties have been unable to resolve this matter by the end of the stay, Defendant is instructed to file their answer. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 9/2/16. (cmr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION TEXTRON, INC. and TEXTRON SPECIALIZED VEHICLES, * INC., * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * TRAXXAS, LP, and DOES 1-10, CV 116-081 * * Defendants. * * * ORDER Presently before the Court is the parties' to Close this Case Administratively. the parties represent that they (Doc. are Consent Motion 23.) currently settlement discussions and that Defendant Traxxas, better spent continuing these answer, which is due today. discussions than Specifically, engaged in LP's time is filing its So they request that the Court administratively close the case. Instead, the Court will STAY this matter for forty-five days. If, at the end of this stay, the parties have settled, then they should file a stipulation of dismissal. If, however, the parties have been unable to resolve this matter by the end of the stay, Defendant is instructed to file their answer. Within ten days from that date, the parties must conduct their Rule 26(f) conference, and they must file their Rule 26(f) report within five days from the date of the meeting. ORDER September, ENTERED at Augusta, sta, Georgia this ^p^ "^ ^2^__ day 2016. J. RANDAL HALL UNITETJ jSTATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA of

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?