Clark v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company et al
Filing
48
ORDER granting parties' 47 Motion Approve Revised Settlement Agreement and approving their settlement; granting 47 Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk therefore is instructed to terminate Fluor Enterprises, Inc. This case is stayed pending the resolution of Defendant WECTEC Contractors, Inc.'s bankruptcy proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 07/10/2017. (thb) Modified on 7/10/2017 (thb).
IN THE
FOR THE
UNITED
STATES
DISTRICT
COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
*
JIMMY CLARK,
*
Plaintiff,
*
v.
*
WECTEC CONTRACTORS,
CV
116-083
*
INC.
*
et al.,
*
*
Defendants.
*
ORDER
On
April
3,
2017,
Plaintiff
and
Defendant
Flour
Enterprises, Inc. moved for approval of their settlement in this
case.
(Doc. 44.)
The Court denied that motion on May 16, 2017,
because it contained a pervasive release.
(Doc.
46.)
These
parties have amended their settlement agreement and now ask the
Court again to approve their settlement.
(Doc. 47.)
Under the revised agreement,
Plaintiff releases and discharges any and all claims
he may have under the FLSA,
as well as any other
claims which could have been brought relating to his
pay or reimbursements while employed by Defendant or
which necessarily should have been brought as part
of the claims asserted in the Litigation.
(Doc. 47-1 at 10.)
this
Court
has
Because this release resembles provisions
previously
approved,
the
Court
GRANTS
the
parties'
motion
and APPROVES
their
settlement.
The
Court
also
GRANTS their request to dismiss Plaintiff's claims against Flour
WITH
PREJUDICE.
Flour
the
Enterprises,
Court
ORDERS
The
Clerk
Inc.
this
as
therefore
a party
case
Defendant WECTEC Contractors,
STAYED
is
instruct
in this
pending
case.
the
to
TERMINATE
Furthermore,
resolution
of
Inc.'s bankruptcy proceedings.
ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia this
/0^ day of July,
2017.
J. taANflJAL BALI/ CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED/ STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTiiERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?