Reeves v. United States of America

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING 5 Report and Recommendations, OVERRULING Petitioner's objections, and DISMISSING Petitioner's 2255 motion. The Court DENIES a COA and this civil action stands CLOSED. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 11/16/2016. (maa)

Download PDF
FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT /• FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION '... JO i. 1 I.' 1 •. , ^fjlb NOV 1 b P 2- 25 _ , CLEPT' ED. EiS r. f.:-OA. FRANK EMERY REEVES, Petitioner, CV 116-098 V. (Formerly CR 106-010) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), to which objections have been filed. (Doc. no. 7.) Petitioner does not offer any new information, evidence, or argument that warrants deviation from the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES Petitioner's objections, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, and DISMISSES Petitioner's motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Further, a federal prisoner must obtain a certificate of appealability ("COA") before appealing the denial of his motion to vacate. This Court "must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant." Rule 11(a) to the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. This Court should grant a COA only if the prisoner makes a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, and in consideration of the

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?