Washam v. Burke County Jail
ORDER adopting the 56 Report and Recommendations as the Court's opinion and overrules the parties' objections; granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion to Dismiss. The Court Orders Defendants Bush, Huffman, Wilbert Williams, Young, and Haynes to file an answer with 14 days of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 03/06/2018. (jlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MICHEAL WAYNE WASHAM,
JOHN H.BUSH, Major; CHESTER V.
HUFFMAN,Major; WILBERT WILLIAMS,
Lieutenant; STACY WILLIAMS,Nurse;
KATIE YOUNG,Nurse; and CASSANDRA
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate
Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), to which objections have been filed. (Doc.
nos. 59,62.) In his objections. Plaintiff seeks to amend his claim to pursue nominal damages
in the amount of $315,288 and punitive damages in the amount of $2,174,400. (Doc. no.
59.) In their objections. Defendants argue nothing in Plaintiff's operative complaint can be
construed as a request for nominal damages. (Doc. no. 62.)
In his R&R, the Magistrate Judge concluded that Plaintiff could proceed on a claim
for nominal damages despite his failure to request them. (Doc. no. 56, pp. 5-6.) Nothing in
Defendants' objections warrants a deviation from that well-supported conclusion. (Id.); s^
also Jackson v. Hill. 569 F. App'x 697, 699 (11th Cir. 2014)("[T]he district court should
have considered whether [plaintiff] could recover nominal damages despite his failure to
request that relief[.]"). Moreover, even if Plaintiffs failure to request nominal damages was
fatal to his case, he could merely amend his complaint to request the appropriate relief, as he
seeks to do in his objections.
As the Magistrate Judge explained in his R&R, Plaintiff may not seek $2,174,400 in
punitive damages because he has suffered no physical injury. (See doc. no. 56, pp. 4-5); see
also Al-Amin v. Smith. 637 F.3d 1192, 1196 (11th Cir. 2011)(holding prisoner could not
maintain claim for punitive damages for prison opening his legal mail).
Plaintiffs attempt to amend his claim to request nominal damages is MOOT because he is
being allowed to seek nominal damages. However, while Plaintiff may pursue nominal
damages, he cannot receive $315,288 because nominal damages are defined as $1 or $100.
See Ouainoo v. Citv of HuntsVille. Ala.. 611 F. App'x 953, 955 (11th Cir. 2015)(defining
nominal damages as $1 or $100); Jones v. Crew Distrib. Co.,984 F.2d 405,407-09(11th Cir.
1993) (describing damages of $1 as nominal); see also Bhogaita v. Altamonte Heights
Condo. Ass^n. Inc.. 765 F.3d 1277, 1291 (11th Cir. 2014)(defining "'nominal damages' as
'[a] trifling sum awarded when a legal injury is suffered but there is no substantial loss or
injury to be compensated'") (quoting Black's Law Dictionary 447 (9th ed. 2009)).
Therefore, should he ultimately prevail on his claims. Plaintiff would at most be entitled to
$100 in damages.
Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES the parties' objections, ADOPTS the R&R of
the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. no. 40.) The Court ORDERS Defendants Bush,
Huffman, Wilbeit Williams, Young, and Haynes to file an answer within fourteen days ofthis
SO ORDERED this
day of March, 2018, at Augusta, Georgia.
J. RANDAL HAIX7CHIEF JUDGE
UNITgPWATES DISTRICT COURT
ITHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?