Washam v. Burke County Jail

Filing 95

ORDER ADOPTING the 92 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, as modified herein, as its opinion. The Defendants notified the Court Plaintiff signed and returned the revised release and stipulation of dismissal; the Court denies as moot Defendants' 84 MOTION for Enforcement of Settlement; and denies Plaintiff's 83 , 85 , and 88 Motions challenging the settlement. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 09/19/2018. (jlh) Modified on 9/19/2018 (jlh).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION MICHEAL WAYNE WASHAM, Plaintiff, CV 117-057 JOHN H. BUSH, Major; CHESTER V. HUFFMAN, Major; WILBERT WILLIAMS, Lieutenant; STACEY WILLIAMS,Nurse; KATIE YOUNG,Nurse; and CASSANDRA HAYNES,Captain, Defendants. ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. The Magistrate recommended: (1) granting Defendant's motion to enforce settlement, (2) denying Plaintiffs motion for entry of default, motion to approve agreement, and motion to modify or terminate the private settlement agreement, and (3) ordering Plaintiff to execute the settlement agreement. (Doc. no. 92.) After entry of the Report and Recommendation, Defendants notified the Court Plaintiff signed and returned the revised release and stipulation of dismissal, rendering their motion to enforce settlement moot, and, therefore, they wish to withdraw their motion. (Doc. no. 94.) Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, as modified herein, as its opinion. The Court DENIES as MOOT Defendant's motion to enforce settlement,(doc. no. 84), and DENIES Plaintiffs motions challenging the settlement,(doc. nos. 83, 85, 88). SO ORDERED this /^^ay of September,2018, at Augusta, Georgia. J. HALL,CHIEF JUDGl UNITEDSTATES DISTRICT COURT iRN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?