Garner et al v. United States Of America et al

Filing 43

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. This case stands closed. Each party shall bear their own costs and fees. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 6/14/2018. (pts)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION ROYCE GARNER and GLADYS GARNER, Plaintiffs, * CV 117-086 V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiffs' notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice against all remaining Defendants. have Rule filed their notice under Federal of 41(a)(1)(A)(i) on the basis that "Mnjone of the Plaintiffs' Civil Defendants have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in this Action." All the Defendants complaint. complaint Thus, under have, however, filed an Plaintiffs Rule cannot 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (Doc. 40.) answer to Plaintiffs' voluntarily See Procedure dismiss Pontenberq their v. Boston is still Scientific Corp., 252 F.3d 1253, 1255 (11th Cir. 2001). Nevertheless, warranted. In the Court response to finds that Plaintiffs' Defendants filed a stipulation of dismissal. dismissal filing, all remaining Accordingly, the Court construes Plaintiffs' motion as a request for dismissal by court order under Rule 41(a)(2) and GRANTS Plaintiffs' request to dismiss the remaining Defendants WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court ORDERS the Clerk to CLOSE this case and TERMINATE all deadlines. Each party- shall bear their own costs and fees. ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this June, 2018. ,,'^CHIEF JUDGE "ATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHEl^N DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?