Garner et al v. United States Of America et al
Filing
43
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. This case stands closed. Each party shall bear their own costs and fees. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 6/14/2018. (pts)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
ROYCE GARNER and GLADYS
GARNER,
Plaintiffs,
*
CV 117-086
V.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et
al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiffs' notice of voluntary dismissal
without prejudice against all remaining
Defendants.
have
Rule
filed
their
notice
under
Federal
of
41(a)(1)(A)(i) on the basis that "Mnjone of the
Plaintiffs'
Civil
Defendants have
filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in this Action."
All the
Defendants
complaint.
complaint
Thus,
under
have, however, filed an
Plaintiffs
Rule
cannot
41(a)(1)(A)(i).
(Doc. 40.)
answer to Plaintiffs'
voluntarily
See
Procedure
dismiss
Pontenberq
their
v.
Boston
is
still
Scientific Corp., 252 F.3d 1253, 1255 (11th Cir. 2001).
Nevertheless,
warranted.
In
the
Court
response
to
finds
that
Plaintiffs'
Defendants filed a stipulation of dismissal.
dismissal
filing,
all
remaining
Accordingly, the Court
construes Plaintiffs' motion as a request for dismissal by court
order under Rule 41(a)(2) and GRANTS Plaintiffs' request to dismiss
the remaining Defendants WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The Court ORDERS the
Clerk to CLOSE this case and TERMINATE all deadlines.
Each party-
shall bear their own costs and fees.
ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this
June, 2018.
,,'^CHIEF JUDGE
"ATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHEl^N DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?