Martin v. Wilkes et al

Filing 31

ORDER directing service of the 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on all parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 02/08/2018. (jlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION KENDRICK R. MARTIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SCOTT WILKES, Head Warden; ANTONIO ) ROSS, Sergeant over CERT; and SERENA ) CHANCE, Lieutenant, Individually and in ) their Official Capacities, ) ) Defendants. ) _________ CV 117-127 ORDER _________ Let a copy of this Report and Recommendation be served upon counsel for the parties. Any party who objects to this Report and Recommendation or anything in it must file, not later than February 26, 2018, written objections specifically identifying the portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection is made and the specific basis for objection.1 The Clerk will submit this Report and Recommendation together with any objections to Chief United States District Judge J. Randal Hall, on February 27, 2018. Failure to file specific objections within the specified time means that this Report and Recommendation may become the opinion and order of the Court, Devine v. Prison Health Servs., Inc., 212 F. App’x 890, 892 (11th Cir. 2006), and may limit a party’s appellate rights. Dupree v. Warden, 715 F.3d 1295, 1300 (11th Cir. 2013). Requests for extension of time to file objections to this Report and Recommendation shall be filed with the Clerk of Court for consideration by the undersigned. A party may not appeal a Magistrate Judge’s recommendation directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Appeals may be made only from a final judgment entered by the District Judge. SO ORDERED this 8th day of February, 2018, at Augusta, Georgia. 1 A copy of the objections must be served upon all other parties to the action. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?