Martin v. Wilkes et al
Filing
31
ORDER directing service of the #30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on all parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 02/08/2018. (jlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
KENDRICK R. MARTIN,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
SCOTT WILKES, Head Warden; ANTONIO )
ROSS, Sergeant over CERT; and SERENA
)
CHANCE, Lieutenant, Individually and in
)
their Official Capacities,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_________
CV 117-127
ORDER
_________
Let a copy of this Report and Recommendation be served upon counsel for the
parties. Any party who objects to this Report and Recommendation or anything in it must
file, not later than February 26, 2018, written objections specifically identifying the portions
of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection is made and the specific
basis for objection.1 The Clerk will submit this Report and Recommendation together with
any objections to Chief United States District Judge J. Randal Hall, on February 27, 2018.
Failure to file specific objections within the specified time means that this Report and
Recommendation may become the opinion and order of the Court, Devine v. Prison Health
Servs., Inc., 212 F. App’x 890, 892 (11th Cir. 2006), and may limit a party’s appellate rights.
Dupree v. Warden, 715 F.3d 1295, 1300 (11th Cir. 2013).
Requests for extension of time to file objections to this Report and Recommendation
shall be filed with the Clerk of Court for consideration by the undersigned.
A party may not appeal a Magistrate Judge’s recommendation directly to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Appeals may be made only from a final
judgment entered by the District Judge.
SO ORDERED this 8th day of February, 2018, at Augusta, Georgia.
1
A copy of the objections must be served upon all other parties to the action.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?