Laun v. Augusta University et al

Filing 59

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 56 Motion to Withdraw his motion to seal; as such, Plaintiff's 54 Motion to Seal is deemed withdrawn. ORDER granting Counsel's 58 Amended MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney; denying as moot counsel's 57 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney . Attorneys Regan E. Keebaugh and James E. Radford, Jr., terminated. This case shall remain closed. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 8/7/2023. (gmh)

Download PDF
Case 1:18-cv-00033-JRH-BKE Document 59 Filed 08/07/23 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION * BILLY B. LAUN, II, D.D.S., * Plaintiff, * * llf V. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE * UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA * d/b/a AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY, * CV 118-033 * Defendant. * ORDER Before the Court are several motions: Plaintiff's motion to seal (Doc. 54), Plaintiff's motion to withdraw his motion to seal (Doc. 56), attorneys Regan Keebaugh and James Radford's request to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff (Doc. 57), and attorneys Regan Keebaugh and James Radford's amended request to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff (Doc. 58). The Court first addresses Plaintiff's motions followed by the requests to withdraw. On June 13, 2023, Plaintiff, acting pro se, filed a "consent motion to seal," seeking to seal various portions of the record, including portions of the record containing Plaintiff's medical information. (See Doc. 54.) Plaintiff's motion also contains several purported "admissions" of Defendant. (Id.) Defendant responds to the motion, consenting to Plaintiff's request to seal Case 1:18-cv-00033-JRH-BKE Document 59 Filed 08/07/23 Page 2 of 3 ^^mentions of any treatment letters, clinical notes, or summaries related to Billy Laun, DDS" but denying that Defendant made alleged "admissions" as put forth in Plaintiff's motion. (Doc. 55, at 1- 2.) Subsequently, Plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw his motion to seal because "it is apparent the Board of Regents (BOR) has not consented to the motion [to] seal . . .[and] at this time [Plaintiff] will discuss the consent motion to seal further with Bryan Webb, counsel for the BOR, with hopes to refile a consent motion to seal within the next 1-2 months." (Doc. 56, at 1.) Upon due consideration, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to withdraw his motion to seal (Doc. 56). As such, Plaintiff's motion to seal (Doc. 54) is DEEMED WITHDRAWN. Turning to the requests to withdraw, attorneys Regan Keebaugh and James Radford seek permission to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff in this matter. (Docs. 57, 58.) Mr. Keebaugh and Mr. Radford provided notice of their intent to withdraw to their client. (Doc. 57-1, at 2; Doc. 58-1, at 1-2.) Upon due consideration, the Court GRANTS Regan Keebaugh and James Radford's amended request to withdraw as counsel of record. (Doc. 58) and DENIES AS MOOT Regan Keebaugh and James Radford's first request to withdraw as counsel of record (Doc. 57). TERMINATE Plaintiff. Regan Keebaugh and James The Clerk is DIRECTED to Radford This case SHALL remain closed. as counsel for Case 1:18-cv-00033-JRH-BKE Document 59 Filed 08/07/23 Page 3 of 3 ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this /^ day of August, 2023. J. RANDAL HALL, Crf'lEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?