Hayes v. The Dillon Law Firm, PC et al

Filing 31

ORDER dismissing this matter with prejudice re 29 and 30 Stipulations. The 5 Motion to Dismiss and the 6 Motion to Strike are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to terminate all other motions, if any, and close this case. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees except as otherwise agreed. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/16/2018. (thb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION * * SONDRA HAYES, * * Plaintiff, * V. CV 118-044 THE DILLON LAW FIRM, PC; TRACE DILLON; and GATESTONE & CO. INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants. ORDER Before the Court are the following filings: (1) Defendants Trace Dillon's ^^Dillon and The Defendants") Dillon motion Law Firm, P.C.'s to dismiss (collectively, (Doc. 5); Dillon Defendants' motion to strike (Doc. 6); Plaintiff Sondra Hayes's ('"Plaintiff") and Defendant Gatestone & Co. International, Inc.'s stipulation of dismissal with prejudice (Doc. 29); and Plaintiff's and Dillon Defendants' stipulation of dismissal with prejudice (Doc. 30). The Parties signed their respective stipulations of dismissal. Upon due consideration, the Court finds dismissal appropriate pursuant 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure The two stipulations (Docs. 29, 30) dismiss all claims against all Parties. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this matter shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, Dillon Defendants' motion to dismiss {Doc. 5) is DENIED AS MOOT, and Dillon Defendants' motion to strike (Doc. 6) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE all other motions, if any, and CLOSE this case. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees except as otherwise agreed. ORDER ENTERED at Augusta, Georgia, this / of October, 2018. T J. RA^JD^^HALL, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED^ATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?