Davis v. BOJ of WNC, LLC
Filing
55
ORDER granting 53 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice for attorney Charles Jones. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 5/9/22. (wwp)
United States District Court
Case 1:21-cv-00155-JRH-BKE Document 55 Filed 05/09/22 Page 1 of 1
Southern District of Georgia
TOCCARA DAVIS, a Guardian or
D.W., a minor,
________________________
Plaintiff
v.
1:21-cv-00155-JRH-BKE
Case No. ________________________
BOJ OF WNC, LLC,
Appearing on behalf of
Houston Casualty/Tokio Marine America
_________________________________
(Plaintiff/Defendant)
________________________
Defendant
ORDER OF ADMISSION
It appearing to the Court that the requirements stated in LR 83.4 for admission
pro hac vice have been satisfied, Petitioner’s request to appear pro hac vice in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia in the
subject case is GRANTED.
This 9th day of May, 2022.
_____________________________
_____________________
_
_
UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGIST
TED
CT
CT
*****
NAME OF PETITIONER:
Charles A. Jones
______________________________________________________
Business Address:
Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP
______________________________________________________
Firm/Business Name
401 Ninth St. NW
______________________________________________________
Street Address
20004
Washington
DC
_____________________ ______________________ ________
Street Address (con’t)
City
State
Zip
______________________________________________________
Mailing Address (if other than street address)
_____________________ ______________________ ________
Address Line 2
City
State
Zip
202.662.2074
__________________________________ ___________________
Telephone Number (w/ area code)
Georgia Bar Number
Email Address:
tony.jones@troutman.com
______________________________________________________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?