Greene v. Sheriff, Richmond County Jail

Filing 71

ORDER ADOPTING 59 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and dismissing all claims against Defendants Richmond County Sheriff's Department, Richmond County Internal Affairs, Cindy Jones, Intel J. Thomas, and Sergeant T. Stems, and dismissing John Doe without prejudice because he is insufficiently identified. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 5/13/2024. (gmh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION BRANDON GREENE, Plaintiff, CV 123-114 V. RICHMOND CO. SHERIFF'S DEPT.; RICHMOND CO.INTERNAL AFFAIRS; SEAN MCKENZIE; CINDY JONES; INTEL. J. THOMAS; CAPT. JENKINS; SGT. FLUELLEN; SGT. SEYMORE; CAPT. WHITE; SGT. T. STERNS; LT. ASHLEY; SGT. ROBERTS; OFC. ROBERSON; OFC. GABREIAL; OFC. MORRISON; LT. M. CHEATAM;SGT. N. CO WART; MAJOR MITCHELL; LT. SHELTON; SGT. GEETINGS; CPL. COLEMAN; CPL. CULYER; SGT. MATTHYS; CAPT. DANIELS; LT. N. HARRELL; and JOHN DOE, Defendants. ORDER After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. (Doc. no. 65.) Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation ofthe Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DISMISSES all claims against Defendants Richmond County Sheriffs Department, Richmond County Internal Affairs, Cindy Jones, Intel J. Thomas, and Sergeant T. Stems, and DISMISSES John Doe without prejudice because he is insufficiently identified. The case shall proceed against Defendants Mitchell, Jenkins, McKenzie, Fluellen, Seymore, White, Ashley, Roberts, Roberson, Gabreial, Morrison, Cheatam, Cowart, Shelton, Geetings, Coleman, Culyer, Matthys, Daniels, and HaiTell as described in the Magistrate Judge's April 5, 2024 Order. (Doc. no. 61.) SO ORDERED this J day of May, 2024, at Augusta, Georgia. HONO^BLE J. RANDAL HALL UNITED^TATES DISTRICT JUDGE iRN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?