Jackson v. Morris et al

Filing 19

ORDER directing service re 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 9/26/24. (loh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION KENNIN DWAYNE JACKSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MR. MORRIS, Deputy; MR. A. WOOD, ) Deputy; MR. STEARNS, Deputy / Jail ) Security; MS. R. BRINSON, Classification; ) MR. C. BROWN, Jail Investigator; MR. ) DANIELS, Lieutenant; MS. N. HARELLE, ) Captain; MS. SMITH, Intelligence; MS. J. ) THOMPSON, Intelligence; MR. TOOMER, ) Intelligence; and MR. MITCHELLE, Major, ) ) Defendants. ) _________ CV 124-082 ORDER _________ Objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed by no later than October 15, 2024, must specify each proposed finding of fact and conclusion of law to which objection is made, must state the bases for each such objection, and must be served upon all parties. Failure to file objections by this deadline may result in this Report and Recommendation becoming the opinion and order of the Court. Devine v. Prison Health Servs., Inc., 212 F. App’x 890, 892 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam). Failure to object to any proposed finding of fact or conclusion of law waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court’s adoption of each such factual finding or legal conclusion. 11th Cir. R. 3-1. The Clerk will submit this Report and Recommendation together with any objections to United States District Judge J. Randal Hall on October 16, 2024. Requests for extension of time to file objections shall be filed with the Clerk of Court for consideration by the undersigned. A party may not appeal this Report and Recommendation directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Appeals may be made only from a final judgment. SO ORDERED this 26th day of September, 2024, at Augusta, Georgia. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?