Bowman v. Grange Property and Casualty Insurance Company

Filing 10

ORDER granting 7 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice for attorney Brian Braddy. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 10/28/24. (wwp)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Georgia ROBERT BOWMAN ________________________ Plaintiff v. GRANGE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE ________________________ 1:24-CV-00181-JRH-BKE Case No. ________________________ Appearing on behalf of PLAINTIFF _________________________________ (Plaintiff/Defendant) Defendant ORDER OF ADMISSION It appearing to the Court that the requirements stated in LR 83.4 for admission pro hac vice have been satisfied, Petitioner’s request to appear pro hac vice in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia in the subject case is GRANTED. October This _______ , ______ 28th day of _______________ 2024 . _____________________________ _ ____________________ UNITED UN NIIT TED ED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE DISTRI RICT RI C /MAGI JUDGE ****** NAME OF PETITIONER: BRIAN BRADDY ______________________________________________________ Business Address: YOUR INSURANCE ATTORNEY, PLLC ______________________________________________________ Firm/Business Name 260 PEACHTREE STREET, SUITE 2200 ______________________________________________________ Street Address 30303 ATLANTA GA _____________________ ______________________ ________ Street Address (con’t) City State Zip SAME ______________________________________________________ Mailing Address (if other than street address) _____________________ ______________________ ________ Address Line 2 City State Zip 967126 888-570-5677 __________________________________ ___________________ Telephone Number (w/ area code) Georgia Bar Number Email Address: BPB@YOURINSURANCEATTORNEY.COM ______________________________________________________

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?