Martinson v. Brantley et al

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge as the Court's opinion, denying Plaintiff's #2 request to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissing this action without prejudice, and closing this civil action. Signed by District Judge J. Randal Hall on 3/7/2025. (amd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
V.
)
)
SHERRIFF GINO BRANTLEY; MAJOR
)
LEE; CAPTAIN WHITE; CAPTAIN
)
HARRELL; LIEUTENANT ASHLEY;
)
DEPUTY KING; DEPUTY RILEY;
)
DEPUTY THOMAS; DEPUTY PRESCOTT; )
KANDICE HILLARD; W. CUNNINGHAM; )
THOMAS CLICK; DEPUTY JOHN DOE
)
ONE; DEPUTY JOHN DOE TWO; MAJOR )
DANIELS; MAJOR; CAPTAIN;
)
LIEUTENANT JOHN/JANE DOE THREE/ )
ONE; NURSE JANE DOE TWO; NURSE
)
JANE DOE THREE; NURSE JANE DOE
)
FOUR; CORPORAL JANE DOE FIVE;
)
LIEUTENANT DELGATO; DEPUTY
)
JOHN DOE FOUR; NURSE JANE DOE
)
SIX; NURSE JANE DOE SEVEN;
)
DOCTOR JANE DOE EIGHT; CCS, INC.; )
NURSE PERLEY; and DEPUTY SMITH,
)
)
Defendants.
)
ANTHONY GENO MARTINSON,

CV 125-015

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. (Doc. no. 5.)

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as
its opinion, DENIES Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. no. 2),

DISMISSES this action without prejudice, and CLOSES this civil action. If Plaintiff wishes

to proceed with the claims raised in this case, he should be required to initiate a new lawsuit,
which would require submission of a new complaint. See Dupree v. Palmer. 284 F.3d 1234,
1236 (11th Cir. 2002).
SO ORDERED this

day of March, 2025, at Augusta, Georgia.

7

{

HONO

.E J.RANpfALPIALL

UNITED

AXES DISTRICT JUDGE

'^OUT-HE

1 DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

2