Favors v. Summers, et al

Filing 112

ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's 105 Motion to Change Venue; denying 106 Motion to Reopen Case; denying 107 Motion to Vacate ; denying as moot 110 Motion for Conference with the Defendants. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 5/22/2015. (ca)

n the Eniteb Statto 38iotritt Court
for the boutbern Maria of deorgia
Jgrunowitk flibiion
ANGELA FAVORS-MORRELL,
Plaintiff,
V

CV 200-158

.

LAWRENCE H. SUMMERS and PAUL
O'NEILL,
Defendants.

ORDER

Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Angela FavorsMorrell's Motion to Change Venue (Dkt. no. 105), Motion to
Reopen the Case (Dkt. no. 106), Motion to Vacate all Orders and
Judgement (Dkt. no. 107), and Motion for Conference with the
Defendants (Dkt. no. 110).
Plaintiff seeks to reopen the case pursuant to Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 60(b) (2) because she claims to have new
evidence. The motion itself is conclusory and does not explain
the nature of this new evidence or how it merits reopening the
case. See Dkt. no. 106. She appears to argue in another brief
that the new evidence comprises, virtually, the entire records
of this case and another civil action Plaintiff is involved in,

AO 72A
(Rev. 8182)

and that this evidence establishes "fraud on the court."
Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate All Orders and Judgment likewise
asserts the existence of "new" evidence, which is nothing more
than evidence that has already been presented to the Court. See
Dkt. no. 107. Plaintiff's Motions to Reopen the Case (Dkt. no.
106) and to Vacate All Orders and Judgment (Dkt. no. 107) are
frivolous and therefore DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion to Change
Venue (Dkt. no. 105) and Motion for Conference with the
Defendants (Dkt. no. 110) are DENIED AS MOOT.

SO ORDERED, this 22ND day of May, 2015.

LISA GODBEY 00OD, CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

AO 72A
(Rev. 8/82)