Favors-Morrell v. United States Of America

Filing 65

ORDER denying 63 Motion for Reconsideration re 62 Order on Motion to Vacate Order for fraud on the Court pursuant to Rule 60(d)(3). Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 7/21/2017. (ca)

3n

States! Bisftnct Cottirt

for

^ovtlb^ni Bfotnct of 4leorsfa
iSnttuiiiiidt IBfiiis(fon

ANGELA FAVORS-MORRELL,

Plaintiff,
V.

CV 200-158

STEVEN MNUCHIN, Secretary of
the Treasury,
Defendant.

ANGELA FAVORS-MORRELL & TONY
L. MORRELL,

Plaintiffs,
V.

CV 209-58

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant,

ANGELA FAVORS-MORRELL,

Plaintiff,
V.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.

ANGELA FAVORS-MORRELL,

Plaintiff,

A0 72A

(Rev. 8/82)

CV 211-91

CV 215-24

V.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.

ORDER

In all four cases, the Court entered an order on June 30,

2017, denying Plaintiffs' motions to vacate order for fraud on
the Court and to reopen.

On July 7, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a

^^response" and "final request to vacate, set asisde [sic] the
judgment, and reopen the civil actions."

The Court liberally

construes these pro se filings as motions for reconsideration.
Reconsideration

is

granted sparingly."
CV 410-219,

"an extraordinary remedy,

which should be

Deep Sea Fin., LLC v. QBE Ins., Ltd., No.

2013 WL 1288972,

at *2

(S.D.

Ga.

Mar.

27,

2013)

(quoting Whitesell Corp. v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc., No. CV
103-050,

2010 WL 4025943,

at *7

(S.D. Ga. Oct.

13, 2010)).

A

court must balance "finality and judicial economy" against "the
need to render just decisions."
2010 WL 4025943, at *7).

Id.

(quoting Whitesell Corp.,

Reconsideration "should not be used to

relitigate issues which have already been found lacking."

(quoting Whitesell Corp., 2010 WL 4025943, at *7) .
proper
correct
Id.
A072A

(Rev. 8/82)

given
a

legal

clear

changes,

error of

new

law or

evidence,

or

(quoting Whitesell Corp., 2010 WL 4025943, at *7).
2

It is only

"the

prevent manifest

Id.

need

to

injustice."

Plaintiffs do not present legal changes or new evidence.
There

is

no

clear error of

Court's June 30, 2017 orders.

law or manifest

injustice

The present motions are denied.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons above,

in case number:

•

2:00-CV-158, dkt. no. 132 is DENIED;

•

2:09-CV-58, dkt. no. 87 is DENIED;

•

2:11-CV-91, dkt. no. 63 is DENIED; and

•

2:15-CV-24, dkt. no. 76 is DENIED.

SO ORDERED, this 21st day of July, 2017.

HOST LISA GDDEJEY WOOD, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

A0 72A

(Rev. 8/82)

in the