Favors-Morrell v. United States Of America

Filing 65

ORDER denying 63 Motion for Reconsideration re 62 Order on Motion to Vacate Order for fraud on the Court pursuant to Rule 60(d)(3). Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 7/21/2017. (ca)

Download PDF
3n States! Bisftnct Cottirt for ^ovtlb^ni Bfotnct of 4leorsfa iSnttuiiiiidt IBfiiis(fon ANGELA FAVORS-MORRELL, Plaintiff, V. CV 200-158 STEVEN MNUCHIN, Secretary of the Treasury, Defendant. ANGELA FAVORS-MORRELL & TONY L. MORRELL, Plaintiffs, V. CV 209-58 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, ANGELA FAVORS-MORRELL, Plaintiff, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ANGELA FAVORS-MORRELL, Plaintiff, A0 72A (Rev. 8/82) CV 211-91 CV 215-24 V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER In all four cases, the Court entered an order on June 30, 2017, denying Plaintiffs' motions to vacate order for fraud on the Court and to reopen. On July 7, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a ^^response" and "final request to vacate, set asisde [sic] the judgment, and reopen the civil actions." The Court liberally construes these pro se filings as motions for reconsideration. Reconsideration is granted sparingly." CV 410-219, "an extraordinary remedy, which should be Deep Sea Fin., LLC v. QBE Ins., Ltd., No. 2013 WL 1288972, at *2 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 27, 2013) (quoting Whitesell Corp. v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc., No. CV 103-050, 2010 WL 4025943, at *7 (S.D. Ga. Oct. 13, 2010)). A court must balance "finality and judicial economy" against "the need to render just decisions." 2010 WL 4025943, at *7). Id. (quoting Whitesell Corp., Reconsideration "should not be used to relitigate issues which have already been found lacking." (quoting Whitesell Corp., 2010 WL 4025943, at *7) . proper correct Id. A072A (Rev. 8/82) given a legal clear changes, error of new law or evidence, or (quoting Whitesell Corp., 2010 WL 4025943, at *7). 2 It is only "the prevent manifest Id. need to injustice." Plaintiffs do not present legal changes or new evidence. There is no clear error of Court's June 30, 2017 orders. law or manifest injustice The present motions are denied. CONCLUSION For the reasons above, in case number: • 2:00-CV-158, dkt. no. 132 is DENIED; • 2:09-CV-58, dkt. no. 87 is DENIED; • 2:11-CV-91, dkt. no. 63 is DENIED; and • 2:15-CV-24, dkt. no. 76 is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this 21st day of July, 2017. HOST LISA GDDEJEY WOOD, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA A0 72A (Rev. 8/82) in the

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?