Brown v. Butler et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING 4 the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSSED based on his failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter an appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/18/2012. (csr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORG(ACT 19 All BRUNSWICK DIVISION L ...................... RAYMOND W. BROWN, CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV212-069 Plaintiff, vs. HEIDI BUTLER and CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF REGISTRARS, Defendants. ORDER By Order dated June 29, 2012, the undersigned allowed Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint in an effort, to set forth a plausible claim that his constitutional rights were violated. The undersigned advised Plaintiff that, if he did not amend his Complaint sufficiently, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, with which the undersigned concurred, would be adopted as the opinion of the Court. (Doc. No. 8) Plaintiff responded to the undersigned's Order. In his response to the undersigned's Order, Plaintiff contends that he is not a convicted felon, and Defendant Butler relied on hearsay in informing him that he could not vote. Plaintiff's response to the undersigned's June 29, 2012, Order is insufficient to set forth a plausible claim that Defendant Butler violated his constitutional rights. If Plaintiff wishes to contest his status as a convicted felon, he should pursue any AO 72A Rev. 8/82) available avenues in the Georgia courts. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED based on his failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to ente an appropriate judgment of dismissal. SO ORDERED, this VI day of i1 2012. ODBEY WOOD, CHIEF JUDGE D STATES DISTRICT COURT -IERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AO 72A (Rev. 8/82)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?