Agnone et al v. Camden County, Georgia et al
Filing
107
ORDER ADOPTING 102 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, GRANTS Plaintiff's 78 Motion to Certify Class, 82 , 84 and 91 Motions for Settlement, CERTIFIES the class action, and PRELIMINARY APPROVES the class settlement on the terms and conditions set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/11/2018. (ca)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
BRUNSWICK DIVISION
STEPHEN AGNONE & ENZO
AGNONE;DOUGLAS &
CYNTHIA PORCELLI;BRIDGE
POINTE AT JEKYLL SOUND
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION,
INC., et al..
Plaintiffs,
Civil Action No:
CAMDEN COUNTY,GEORGIA;
WILLIS R. KEENE,JR.; JIMMY
STARLINE; CHUCK CLARK;
TONY SHEPPARD; GARY
BLOUNT;DAVID L. RAINER;
KATHERINE NISI ZELL;
CHARLENE SEARS; STEPHEN
L. BERRY;STEPHEN L.
HOWARD;O. BRENT GREEN;
JOHN MCDILL;DAVID
KEATING;SCOTT BRAZELL;
2:14-CV-00024-LGW-BKE
LEXON INSURANCE
COMPANY;THOMAS A.
DIERUF;DAVID E.
CAMPBELL;JEKYLL SOUND
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,
LLC; and CAMDEN COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT,LLC,
Defendants.
ORDER
After a careful, de novo review of the record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate
Judge's Report and Recommendation. Defendants have affirmed they have no objections to
the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. nos. 98, 100.) Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the
Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, GRANTS Plaintiffs'
Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement and Certification of Settlement Class
and three supplements thereto,(doc. nos. 78, 82, 84, 91), CERTIFIES the class action, and
PRELIMINARILY APPROVES the class settlement on the terms and conditions set forth
in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.
SO ORDERED this J_L day ofOctob^^ 018.
nm.iVSAJi^DBEY WOOD,JUDGE
UJ IITED^fATES DISTRICT COURT
UJHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?