Agnone et al v. Camden County, Georgia et al

Filing 124

ORDER directing service of the 123 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on all parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 03/26/2019. (jlh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
BRUNSWICK DIVISION
STEPHEN AGNONE & ENZO
AGNONE; DOUGLAS &
CYNTHIA PORCELLI; BRIDGE
POINTE AT JEKYLL SOUND
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION,
INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CAMDEN COUNTY, GEORGIA;
WILLIS R. KEENE, JR.; JIMMY
STARLINE; CHUCK CLARK;
TONY SHEPPARD; GARY
BLOUNT; DAVID L. RAINER;
KATHERINE NISI ZELL;
CHARLENE SEARS; STEPHEN
L. BERRY; STEPHEN L.
HOWARD; O. BRENT GREEN;
JOHN MCDILL; DAVID
KEATING; SCOTT BRAZELL;
LEXON INSURANCE
COMPANY; THOMAS A.
DIERUF; DAVID E.
CAMPBELL; JEKYLL SOUND
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,
LLC; and CAMDEN COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No:
2:14-cv-00024-LGW-BKE

_________
ORDER
_________
The Court ORDERS that any party seeking to object to the Report and
Recommendation file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on

which the Report and Recommendation is entered.

Any objections asserting that the

Magistrate Judge failed to address any contention raised in the pleading must also be
included. Failure to do so will bar any later challenge or review of the factual findings or
legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140 (1985). A copy of the objections must be served upon all other parties to the
action.

The filing of objections is not a proper vehicle through which to make new

allegations or present additional evidence.
Upon receipt of objections meeting the specificity requirement set out above, a United
States District Judge will make a de novo determination of those portions of the report,
proposed findings, or recommendation to which objection is made and may accept, reject, or
modify in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.
Objections not meeting the specificity requirement set out above will not be considered by a
District Judge. A party may not appeal a Magistrate Judge’s recommendation directly to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Appeals may be made only from a
final judgment entered by or at the direction of a District Judge. The Court DIRECTS the
Clerk to serve a copy of this Report and Recommendation upon the parties.
SO ORDERED this 26th day of March, 2019, at Augusta, Georgia.

2

3