Agnone et al v. Camden County, Georgia et al

Filing 38

ORDER directing the parties to file a joint status report within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order re 37 Order on Motion to Stay Discovery and Postpone the Filing of the Rule 26(f) Report. (Joint Status Report due by 4/8/2016.). Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 3/25/2016. (ca)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION STEPHEN AGNONE; ENZO AGNONE; DOUGLAS PORCELLI; CYNTHIA PORCELLI; BRIDGE POINTE AT JEKYLL SOUND COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:14-CV-24 v. CAMDEN COUNTY, GEORGIA; WILLIS R. KEENE, JR.; JIMMY STARLINE; CHUCK CLARK; TONY SHEPPARD; GARY BLOUNT; DAVID L. RAINER; KATHERINE NISI ZELL; CHARLENE SEARS; STEPHEN L. BERRY; STEPHEN L. HOWARD; O. BRENT GREEN; JOHN MCDILL; DAVID KEATING; and SCOTT BRAZELL, Defendants. ORDER The Court granted the parties’ joint Motion to Stay this action on October 5, 2015. (Doc. 37.) The stay was intended to enable some of the Plaintiffs in this case to exhaust their appellate rights in a related case before this Court. Id. In that related case, the Court dismissed the Complaint of the Intervenors (some of whom are Plaintiffs in this case). See, Order, Camden County v. Lexon, 2:14-cv-00020 (S.D. Ga. Sep. 1, 2015) ECF No. 145. However, it appears that the Intervenors in the related case are not currently pursuing any appellate remedies. Accordingly, the parties are hereby ORDERED to file a joint status report within fourteen days of the date of this Order. In that report, the parties should address the status of this case and their related litigation and should state their respective positions as to whether this case should remain stayed. SO ORDERED, this 25th day of March, 2016. R. STAN BAKER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?