Agnone et al v. Camden County, Georgia et al
Filing
38
ORDER directing the parties to file a joint status report within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order re 37 Order on Motion to Stay Discovery and Postpone the Filing of the Rule 26(f) Report. (Joint Status Report due by 4/8/2016.). Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 3/25/2016. (ca)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
BRUNSWICK DIVISION
STEPHEN AGNONE; ENZO AGNONE;
DOUGLAS PORCELLI; CYNTHIA
PORCELLI; BRIDGE POINTE AT JEKYLL
SOUND COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION,
INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:14-CV-24
v.
CAMDEN COUNTY, GEORGIA; WILLIS R.
KEENE, JR.; JIMMY STARLINE; CHUCK
CLARK; TONY SHEPPARD; GARY
BLOUNT; DAVID L. RAINER; KATHERINE
NISI ZELL; CHARLENE SEARS; STEPHEN
L. BERRY; STEPHEN L. HOWARD; O.
BRENT GREEN; JOHN MCDILL; DAVID
KEATING; and SCOTT BRAZELL,
Defendants.
ORDER
The Court granted the parties’ joint Motion to Stay this action on October 5, 2015.
(Doc. 37.) The stay was intended to enable some of the Plaintiffs in this case to exhaust their
appellate rights in a related case before this Court. Id. In that related case, the Court dismissed
the Complaint of the Intervenors (some of whom are Plaintiffs in this case). See, Order, Camden
County v. Lexon, 2:14-cv-00020 (S.D. Ga. Sep. 1, 2015) ECF No. 145. However, it appears that
the Intervenors in the related case are not currently pursuing any appellate remedies.
Accordingly, the parties are hereby ORDERED to file a joint status report within fourteen
days of the date of this Order. In that report, the parties should address the status of this case and
their related litigation and should state their respective positions as to whether this case should
remain stayed.
SO ORDERED, this 25th day of March, 2016.
R. STAN BAKER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?